Posts

Showing posts from June, 2013

Laura Dolson on the recent meeting of the American Society of Bariatric Physicians

Image
*** Can you help a girl out?  Where is the traffic coming from?? Thanks! *** In the past week, I've noticed a sustained trickle of traffic to this post of mine from over a year ago (original publish date 4/28/12) .  Therefore, rather than write another post on a somewhat older topic, I decided to bump this one and add some comments.   For most of this year I have been under attack for posts of this nature and all I can do to counter those is to point out that this post is not a personal attack.  What I've written is as respectful as can be when the subject is someone who, were she promoting veganism or McDougall's diet would be vilified and likely destroyed in the LC community.   Yet I haven't done so even though I believe Laura Dolson is deserved of some criticism for not telling the full story here.

The BE&HM Series ~ Part VIII: Electron "Ownership" & Non-Reversible Oxidation

Image
Previous posts in this series:  Biophysical Electrochemistry and Human Metabolism , Part II: Atoms & The Periodic Table , Part III: The Main Group Elements, The Octet Rule and Ions , Part IV: Ionic Compounds, Elements & Oxidation State Defined , Part V: Covalent Bonding & Molecules , Part VI: Electron "Ownership" & Polarity , Part VII:  Chemical Reactions In a lot of the discussions of mitochondria and the various metabolic pathways in general, the term "redox" gets thrown around a lot.  Redox is a contraction of the terms reduction and oxidation.  This generally applies to reversible reactions where one species is oxidized and the other reduced, but it actually applies to all reactions wherein electrons are "transferred" from one element to another.  Where I'm going here (and I don't know when I'll get there, but I will)  is to discuss redox couples and basically how we are electrochemical machines where one chemical reac

Protein Metabolism

Image
This one I'm bumping for myself, but perhaps some folks might find it interesting.  The red bolding is new. Original Publication:  4/17/10 Looking for some info on protein, I came across this link: http://www.nutrition-partner.com/index.cfm?C27B8FF7FABF494CAA480EF21E0D228D The page focuses on changes in dietary requirements and/or the impact on the body of malnutrition, disease and stress, but I found this site through the following graphic on protein metabolism: Something in the numbers doesn't add up here, but I was surprised to see how much protein is "recycled" in our guts.  Perhaps the total protein synthesis is balanced by catabolism/turnover and that is the missing number?  Not sure.  Here is the quoted text referring to this diagram (my apologies for the messed up formatting).   Protein in the body is not static; protein synthesis and breakdown is constantly taking place. However, the total body protein pool in a healthy adu

The Low Carb Diet Meal Delusion

Image
Fat Head had a post up yesterday .  In it he has the picture of the dining cart scene from Silver Streak (loved that movie!)   The gist, grandma (and his high school wresting coach) knew it was carbs that were fattening and the diet plates were LC.  I would point out that wrestlers employing various dietary schemes to make weight for competition are probably not a good advertising point for any diet.  Meeting a number on the scale, or in the case of body builders looking ripped for competitions, is not necessarily equivalent to consuming a healthful diet (especially for the long term).  Wrestlers are prevalent among the growing numbers of men with eating disorders.

Eating less .....

Japanese style.  I just had two quotes/sayings to share today.  The first is one you may be familiar with: Hara hachi bu :   ( 腹八分 ) , or  hara hachi bunme  (and sometimes misspelled  hari hachi bu ), is a  Confucian   teaching that instructs people to eat until they are 80 percent full.    Roughly, in English the  Japanese  phrase translates to, "Eat until you are eight parts (out of ten) full",  or "belly 80 percent full".

The Ache now?

Image
Robb Wolf has another post up complaining  about paleo bashing.  This time it is about this article in Scientific American:   How to Really Eat Like a Hunter-Gatherer: Why the Paleo Diet Is Half-Baked .  Such articles are written because: People, particularly folks in the academic scene, seem to really have their britches bunched over biochemists, MD’s and others using this evolutionary biology concept to look at nutrition and health. Yeah that's it.  The article begins with: image link Meet Grok . According to his online profile, he is a tall, lean, ripped and agile 30-year-old. By every measure, Grok is in superb health: low blood pressure; no inflammation; ideal levels of insulin, glucose, cholesterol and triglycerides. He and his family eat really healthy, too. They gather wild seeds, grasses, and nuts; seasonal vegetables; roots and berries. They hunt and fish their own meat. Between foraging, building sturdy shelters from natural materials, collecting firewood and

Fast or Feltham III

Image
This will be the last of the post with this title, until perhaps sometime in September when Sam Feltham plans to do another publicity stunt the oh so insightful will fawn over and promote as science and whatnot.  However, the post title is a play on "Feast or Famine" and intended to highlight the great disparity between the claims about calories in the "alternate" community and the actual practices engaged in by long time converts to the "opposite of everything we've ever been taught about nutrition" folks.    See:  Fast or Feltham  and  Fast or Feltham II .

Battle of the Obesity Experts!

Image
Sam Feltham and Zoe Harcombe "battle it out" over 5-a-Day! UPDATE:   @CarbSane @zoeharcombe Thank you for the critique Evelyn but that Sky interview was last year and my opinions have evolved from then... — Sam Feltham (@samfeltham) June 22, 2013 I've now asked him how he was eating in 2010.  He's already, in another tweet, said he was lifting 2X/day back then for a competition in Men's Health.  Due to time constraints he only lifts 12 min/week now.  

That 5000 Calorie Jokesperiment

Image
Note:  I started this article with the intent of it being a single stand-alone before Smash the Fat's Sam Feltham had done his final summary of his overeating stunt.  Since then, however, he has written said summary and I've written two posts discussing this disconnect between the you-can-eat-all-the-calories claims and the current uber-restrictive low carb plans many long time low carbers are actually following themselves.  See:   Fast or Feltham and Fast or Feltham II Apologies in Advance :  I wrote this with updates/edits over several days and with "new information" coming in the interim.  It could probably use a good bit of editing and crunching down, but as this is just a blog, I'm going to publish it up w/o wasting time on that.  Please forgive the length, repetitiveness, etc.  Thanks!

Must See "TV" for those suffering from CDS

BUMP!  Original posting:  1/24/11 CDS = Calorie Denial Syndrome BBC Story about Low Carb Dieting - Part 1 BBC Story about Low Carb Dieting - Part 2 BBC Story about Low Carb Dieting - Part 3 BBC Story about Low Carb Dieting - Part 4 BBC Story about Low Carb Dieting - Part 5 (HatTip to Wolfstriked for linking to this in comments.) Just a few thoughts on this aside from the content so that my opinions will not cloud your listening of the presentation: I found it interesting that they showed both Westman and Foster exercising (running and playing basketball) in their intros in the piece.  Indeed they are interviewed in their gym clothes!  Then there's Dr. Mary Vernon horseback riding.  Did we need so many closeup chewing scenes?  And, lastly, was the full rear (albeit blurred) Sipowitz moment in the shower, actually that rather lengthy soaping/showering scene, really necessary as a backdrop to the discussion of ketosis?

Fast or Feltham II

Image
Busy weekend here!  I'm working on a couple of posts, one of which is a closer look at the 5000 calorie/day stunt by Sam Feltham as that provides a context in which to discuss some common CICO strawmen.  But a comment came across the feed reader yesterday that caught my eye with a few more thoughts in the vein of my first Fast or Feltham post.  I'm not going to say much more about Feltham here except to say that his experiment was basically "nuts".  The majority of his calories (53%) were from walnuts, pecans and almonds, to the tune of a pound a day, containing more than the entire claimed caloric surplus, and almost the full claimed surplus in nut fat calories.  This was a stunt that demonstrated nothing other than that Feltham likely doesn't digest nuts well, and is using this to promote a rip-off of Jonathan Bailor's clogged sink scam.  But stunts like this bring the calorie deniers out of the woodwork as various folks will be like "did you see

Fast or Feltham ...

Image
The title of this post is a play on "feast or famine".   One of the things about blogging, for me anyway, is that over time you accumulate a draft bin full of posts that never get published.  Some of these are on studies I never got the chance to fully flesh out, others are on the "goings on" during a particular time that never seemed appropriate to hit Publish on by the time they were ready.  They are the closest thing I have to a diary and it can often be interesting to read back through the draft bin.   It is hard to believe that I've been blogging over three years now, and involved in this community for more than another year longer than that.  Barely a blink of an eye compared to some but my how times have changed.  This time four years ago Mark Sisson published Primal Blueprint and Jimmy Moore weighed around 245 lbs after getting down to the mid 230's earlier in the year.  Nobody would have known about or considered eating nothing but eggs for

The Heritage of Corpulence

OBESITY is a disorder which, like venereal disease, is blamed upon the patient. The finding that treatment doesn’t work is ascribed to lack of fortitude. Corpulence in America is regarded along with narcotic addiction as something wicked, and I shall not be surprised if soon we have a prohibition against it in the name of national security. The condition is referred to in disparaging terms, including the most impolite references to the appetite. Appetite is held to be the cause, but I say it is hunger. I wish to propose that obesity is an inherited disorder and due to a genetically determined defect in an enzyme; in other words, that people who are fat are born fat, and nothing much can be done about it. I would like further to propose that the more serious of the consequences of being fat are not due to the corpulence but to the inherited defects; if this be so and we like food, we might as well eat up and be happy. Astwood, 1962    Adding:  A free double Cherry Pickin' Mart

The Myth of Starving Cells II and NEFA Levels Again.

Image
Related Post:   Insulin Doing Its Thang! And Still No Starving Cells .  It discusses another study by Keith Frayn that shows increased NEFA uptake into the muscle cells of men with hyperinsulinemia.  It may be worth a read for newer readers along with The Myth of Starving Cells. Original Content Published June 7, 2013: A couple of years ago I wrote:   The Myth of Starving Cells .  As the story goes --as related by science journalist Gary Taubes, to Low Carb Diet Doctor Mike Eades, to Fat Head Naughton -- insulin traps our fat in our fat cells, causing "internal starvation" as the rest of our cells go without, triggering hunger and overeating.   We overeat because we are getting fat, or some nonsense like that.   In the post, I discussed studies demonstrating the opposite is true.  In obesity, there is failure to properly suppress NEFA release from fat cells, NEFA are elevated in the fasted state, and irrespective of absolute concentration, NEFA delivery to cells.  Th

Why Fructose is NOT Like Alcohol

Image
Where did this come from? Beginning with his viral YouTube video (I won't link to it, every additional view is one view too many!), and continuing on, Dr. Robert Lustig has been making the claim that fructose is metabolized like alcohol by the liver.  You cannot make your misinformation more clear than to title a section in your book as Lustig did in Fat Chance --   Fructose versus Ethanol:  Pick Your Poison. Before Lustig, I don't think I'd ever heard anyone equate sugar to alcohol on a metabolic level.  A few may have made an addiction analogy, but it was Lustig who "taught" us the "science" that the liver processes sugar just like alcohol. It is shocking to me that his video was produced and distributed by an institution of higher learning as a "Mini Medical School for the Public" presentation.  This implies to me that the content has been somewhat vetted.  Apparently it has not been, and also, nobody within that establishment has

Announcement: Alan Aragon's Research Review Article

Image
I'm proud to announce that I was asked to contribute an article to the April/May 2013 edition of Alan Aragon's Research Review.    Type 2 Diabetes:  Insulin Resistance or Insulin Deficiency? Yes, it's for subscribers only, so if you're not one already, there's no time like the present to sign up!   Alan Aragon's Research Review {BTW, between working on the rather lengthy article and a print interview and suffering some devastating word processor crashes, I've been a bit more sparse than usual answering comments, etc.  Please don't take it personally if I didn't respond, I'm going to try to go back through the past week when I get a chance and check if I missed anything.}

GCBC Reference Check ~ Part VIII of ? ~ The Paleo Diet

Preface:  When I first read GCBC some time in 2009, I skimmed over the parts that were irrelevant to my issues with the book, which were on the basis of Taubes' misrepresentations of metabolism and obesity, etc.  In the intervening years I've gone back and read large chunks of it in more detail, but if I ever read the parts about the Paleolithic, I didn't take much note at the time because the names were not familiar to me.   I've always found it odd how Taubes was described as paleo in some circles, his book is even cited on an infographic  listing 10 years of paleo literature!  Aside from calling out refined carbs and sugar quite a bit, Taubes doesn't really make much of a deal about quality of foods, especially fats.  (Shhhhhh, don't tell the paleo peeps, but peanut oil is listed as an "especially healthy" oil in WWGF - Kindle Locations 3423-3424 )

Another Great Quote

In reality, those who repudiate a theory that they had once proposed, or a theory that they had accepted enthusiastically and with which they had identified themselves, are very rare.   The great majority of them shut their ears so as not to hear the crying facts, and shut their eyes so as not to see the glaring facts, in order to remain faithful to their theories in spite of all and everything.   MAURICE ARTHUS, Philosophy of Scientific Investigation, 1921 Taubes, Gary (2007-09-25). Good Calories, Bad Calories (Kindle Locations 1514-1518). Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.