Welcome all seeking refuge from low carb dogma!

“To kill an error is as good a service as, and sometimes even better than, the establishing of a new truth or fact”
~ Charles Darwin (it's evolutionary baybeee!)

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Insulin Response of Long Term Type 2 Diabetics Improved with Amino Acids

Amino Acid Ingestion Strongly Enhances Insulin Secretion in Patients With Long-Term Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE—Insulin secretion in response to carbohydrate intake is blunted in type 2 diabetic patients. However, it is not clear whether the insulin response to other stimuli, such as amino acids, is also diminished. Recently, we defined an optimal insulinoptropic mixture containing free leucine, phenylalanine, and a protein hydrolysate that substantially enhances the insulin response in healthy young subjects when coingested with carbohydrate. In this study, we aimed to investigate the insulinotropic capacity of this mixture in long-term type 2 diabetic patients.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Ten type 2 diabetic patients (aged 59.1 ± 2.0 years, BMI 26.5 ± 0.7 kg/m2) and 10 healthy control subjects (58.8 ± 2.1 years, 26.5 ± 0.7 kg/m2) visited our lab twice, during which insulin responses were determined following ingestion of carbohydrate only (CHO) or carbohydrate with the free amino acid/protein mixture (CHO+PRO). All subjects received 0.7 g · kg−1 · h−1 carbohydrate with or without 0.35 g · kg−1 · h−1 of the amino acid/protein mixture.
RESULTS—Insulin responses were dramatically increased in the CHO+PRO trial in both the type 2 diabetic and control groups (189 and 114%, respectively) compared with the CHO trial (P < 0.01). Plasma glucose, glucagon, growth hormone, cortisol, IGF-I, and IGF binding protein 3 responses were not different between trials within the 2-h time frame.
CONCLUSIONS—The insulin secretory capacity in long-term type 2 diabetic patients is substantially underestimated, as the insulin response following carbohydrate intake can be nearly tripled by coingestion of a free amino acid/protein mixture. Future research should be performed to investigate whether such nutritional interventions can improve postprandial glucose disposal.

My Summary:  10 adult males with Type 2 diabetes >8 yrs and ready to switch to insulin therapy were compared to 10 normal adult males.  Each group was fed either a standardized carbohydrate only meal (CHO) or the carb along with a protein mixture containing free amino acids.  The insulin responses were increased in both groups given the protein/AA mixture.

So ... what was the composition of this magical protein mixture?   The dose was 0.35 g · kg−1 · h−1 of an amino acid/protein hydrolysate mixture.  The mixture consisted of a wheat protein hydrolysate (50%, 0.17 g · kg−1 · h−1), free leucine (25%, 0.09 g · kg−1 · h−1), and free phenylalanine (25%, 0.09 g · kg−1 · h−1).  This was administered  in 3 mL/kg boluses  at 0, 30, 60, and 90 min.

For "A", the open symbols are the CHO only, the black symbols are the CHO/PRO group.  The circles are the T2's the squares are the normal controls.  

Remember, these are T2's who are about to become insulin dependent.  We see that the T2's had less than half the insulin response to CHO that the normal controls have (clear bars in "B").  We also see that using the protein along with the CHO, the T2's had an insulin response similar or even a little better than that mounted by the normal "unstimulated" controls as evidenced in both "A" and "B" above.

The results don't impact glucose levels a whole lot, however.

The shape of the normal control curve does show a lower max BG (something that might show up better but for the scale to accomodate the BG levels of the T2's).  The glucose clearance does not seem to be improved by the insulin response in the T2's.  Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmm.  Seems the IR of the T2's is still "in force".  For this treatment to reduce hyperglycemia, it seems the underlying resistance to insulin needs to be addressed.  

However this does demonstrate that long term T2's may not have "worn out" their pancreases with their hyperinsulinemia after all, but rather than chronically elevated BG's may reduce the pancreas' response to acute BG rises.  

Still, this points to me that even long-ongoing T2 diabetes could theoretically be reversed.  The subjects in this study were only mildly overweight.  What is the underlying cause of the IR in these Type 2's?


Kindke said...

Wow this study was an eye opener.

CarbSane said...

Welcome to my blog Kindke! I've come across quite a few similar studies indicating that insulin responses can be dramatically increased with various amino acids -- leucine and phenylalanine seem to be the "biggies" but there are a couple of others. It would seem if IR could be addressed, these diabetics are capable of being "cured"?!

Kindke said...

I dont know for certain but what worries me is this study..

If the degree of insulin sensitivity is related to a cell's size for adipocytes maybe the same is true for other types of cells?

This is wild speculation but in mechanics the elastic limit or yield point is the point of no return for the deformation of a elastic body. I.E. the point that if a body is stretched to or/and beyond, it will never return to its original shape.

With the above in mind, what if a cell is capable of being so overstuffed with an abundance of fuel substrates that it passes its mechanical yield point and also thus chemically remains permenantly insulin in-sensitive?

This is the first time in our history that we have ever been exposed to the situation where food availability far exceeds our expenditure and thus I dont think there is any evolved traits to help us deal with this insulin in-sensitivity problem.

CarbSane said...

Although supposedly our number of fat cells is determined by our late teens, this doesn't mean we have those fat cells all our life. There is turnover of these cells. Trying to recall the med, but one of the meds for T2 actually helps by increasing formation of new fat cells that are insulin sensitive.

Interesting elastic limit theory there. That's possible, but I wonder for the existing cells, since they are living things, if they're capable of remodeling/repair unlike the non-living balloon. I'll take a look at that full study when I get a chance. Since FA uptake is facilitated diffusion, the "stuffed cell" would present a far smaller gradient than the relatively empty one. I wonder if it is IR or just that insulin isn't sufficient to suppress release of all those FA's ??

Post a Comment

Moderation is currently on. Thanks in advance for your patience.