Processed Dairy and Low-Fat Dairy-Phobia
I brought this topic up once or twice on Jimmy's forum back in the day. Basically, aside from whole raw milk fresh from the cow, all dairy meets the definition of processed food. This was usually met with absurd comparisons claiming I was equating butter with Crisco, or real cheese with Cheetos and Cheese Whiz. Let's please put that strawman to bed right now. I am not equating dairy products such as cream, cheese, yogurt, and butter with InsertNameBrandHere processed cheese food slices. But make no mistake about it, you let raw milk sit around and it does not become any of the aforementioned without *some* processing.
Jimmy is apparently learning "life lessons" from TV these days and thinks Angie Harmon is clueless for promoting milk drinking in children, low fat of course. He misrepresents what she says, but it's useless to try to correct someone Livin la Vida Low Clue. (Harmon cites milk as one way to get essential nutrients, not the only way.)
Many in paleo circles treat anything but raw milk as poison of some sort. While I "get that" from a whole/real foods point of view, I'm all for folks getting and consuming raw whole dairy when they can find it, and I'm against the idiocy of outlawing selling same (use appropriate disclaimers and let buyer beware/educated!!), mass distribution of raw milk to feed this nation would be an unmitigated disaster.
Now as much of a dairy lover as I am myself -- cheeses hard and soft mostly, never much of a drinker -- regular readers likely know that when I really think about dairy consumption, it makes me a bit squirmish. While animals have been known to "wet nurse" abandoned little ones of other species even in the wild, and no doubt animals would consume the milk of their lactating prey, it just does not seem "natural" for adult humans to use the infant food of another species, in this case predominantly cows, as a major food source. Yet dairy is so beloved, in fact, that allowances are readily made for its consumption in paleo circles.
One quibble I have with the Jaminets and Perfect Health Diet is the predication of dietary composition on infant food being the perfect adult human food. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding that aspect of PHD. I agree that it is obviously the perfect food/diet composition for humans under a couple years of age. And yet consumption past age 2 or so is rare, and almost unheard of past age 5 or so. The reasons for this can be debated, but are largely irrelevant since the fact of the matter is that humans generally don't consume a mother's-milk diet and are getting all their nutrition from other foods from a relatively early age.
And yet dairy from other species, primarily cow and goat, has been integral to the human diet for millenia and humans in general seem to thrive on dairy. It is also the most palatable animal fat in my opinion. Without salt and crisping, animal body fat is rather gross in my book, but I could eat butter (salted preferred, but unsalted OK) by the pat ... same for drinking cream. Dairy fat is a favorite for fat overfeeding studies!
So anyway, there are certain foods that are favorites amongst low carbers and paleo types. Cream, cream cheese and butter rule in Atkins-land, while ghee (butter purified of milk solids) is acceptable in paleo circles. Let's start with the cream. It's not a huge process, but how is it made? Well, milk is left to sit, the fat/cream rises to the top and then it is skimmed off. Umm ... this leaves ... skimmed milk! And yet somehow the skimmed stuff is inherently healthy while that left behind is not? Worse, the logic here seems to be that some (not the sum) of the parts are better than the whole. An argument could fly that cream would naturally arise from milk on its own (however milk is never consumed in nature by expressing and letting it sit, it's suckled from the source) ... but this is where I would draw the line. Anything more requires *processing* of some sort.
I recall when I mentioned this over on Jimmy's forum, one response that milk basically turned to cheese when left to sour. Umm ... no. You make yogurt by adding cultures. My mom used to make her own with a "sponge" my aunt gave her. You make cheese by adding enzymes. You make butter by churning which separates the fat from the liquids and most milk solids (proteins). You make ghee by dissolving the milk solids remaining in butter in hot water and skimming off purified fat.
The bottom line -- and this is no endorsement of refined/processed grain foods -- is that there's not much difference from a whole-food point of view between isolating the starch or oil from a seed and isolating the fat from milk. I'm not talking about the difference in the isolation/extraction process mind you, but just the notion that one is isolating and concentrating one component of a whole food.
Even Fructophobe-in-Chief Robert Lustig gives lactose and milk a pass from his caloric liquids. I agree. It is probably ideal to avoid all liquid calories, but you can do worse than "pouring one more" glass of milk for your kids (and it looks like Angie's pouring 2% there, certainly not skim milk). Let's compare
Contrary to what Jimmy and other low carbers will claim, lower fat dairy is not "loaded" with extra sugars. They just take the fat out. I think my 2% cottage cheese has like 2g carb/serving more than the full fat version by weight. It's not *added* sugar as is often implied by these lowfat dairy-phobes. My 0% fat Greek yogurt (ideally I'd get 2% but this is way cheaper from where I get it) is made with skim milk and cultures. Period. Who decided that dairy fat = healthy, the rest = not? Well, the rest is apparently healthy and the staple of many low carb dieters -- yep! Process/refine it a bit more and you get whey protein for your shakes and smoothies. Aside for the lactose-intolerant, is there any sense to this logic as far as deciding what whole foods and what isolates from them are healthy or not? (And don't look now but whey is one of the most insulinogenic foods on the planet!)
I propose that low-fat dairy is a perfectly fine food in most cases. No fat? In the context of an otherwise balanced diet, there's no ultimate *need* to be getting a lot of fat from dairy in the diet. Low fat real dairy is almost certainly not a cause of the obesity epidemic in this country (nor is promotion of a low fat diet for that matter). And certainly kids can do a lot worse than getting 8g of animal protein with or without fat.
Comments
Re fat in dairy, my general feeling is that if you're going to eat fat, you better eat good fats. My preference is to eat nutrient-dense fat (like liver or egg yolks from pastured animals) first, then more benign fat sources (like coconut oil) as needed for satiety. I put the fat in CAFO dairy pretty close to veggie oil in fats to avoid; so if I'm not getting locally sourced dairy, I'm going as low-fat as possible.
* http://healthcorrelator.blogspot.com/2011/10/book-review-perfect-health-diet.html
Thanks for posting the link Beth, I enjoyed Ned's review. I guess I'm still not "getting" the difference really. The fatty acid profile of dairy is markedly different from other animal fat. I think that many (myself included) have digestive upheaval from too many MCT's is an indication that perhaps they're not as desired for many.
http://www.hulu.com/watch/289122/fat-sick-and-nearly-dead
A guy ~40 yrs old and 90 pounds overweight with chronic autoimmune urticaria goes on a juice fast for 60 days. It's a journey kind of movie. Don't be put off by all the cartoons at the beginning.
I've always used this argument about processing whenever someone I know says that are cutting out processed foods. That word had about as much meaning as 'metabolic derangement' these days.
Food choices and coronary heart disease: a population based cohort study of rural Swedish men with 12 years of follow-up.
Holmberg S, Thelin A, Stiernström EL.
Research and Development Centre, Kronoberg County Council, Box 1223, SE-351 12 Växjö, Sweden. sara.holmberg@ltkronoberg.se
This paper can be accessed at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20054459
This study involved 1,752 men over 12 years and investigated the association of various food items with heart disease.
The study found:
(a) Daily intake of fruit and vegetables was associated with a 61% lower risk of coronary heart disease when combined with a high dairy fat consumption.
(b) Daily intake of fruit and vegetables was associated with a 70% higher risk of coronary heart disease when combined with a low dairy fat consumption.
(c) Choosing wholemeal bread or eating fish at least twice a week showed no association with the outcome.
> food being the perfect adult human food
the supposition that every single component of mother's milk exists because of specific advantages conferred by evolutionary forces looks like the hyper adaptationist stance applied to diet.
yes, mother's milk has to be a good diet for infants but to suppose it's the perfectly optimal diet is iffy. Other dietary elements may be beneficial or better than what's currently in there but could have been
> too big of a leap by themselves
> in conflict with other evolutionary pressures (too big of a leap in combination with whatever else is being selected for)
> or too biologically expensive (maybe requiring rare minerals, or lots of energy that could be used other places)
to have evolved (yet).
Like human designs, evolution's designs involve compromise: they are economically constrained (all titanium car bodies would be great ...) and historically constrained (preferences for brick exteriors and basements and a green lawn in front of every house ... all suboptimal, but we have to live with it for resale value).
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=ubuntu&hs=bNI&channel=fs&q=%22hyper+adaptationism%22&oq=%22hyper+adaptationism%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=1&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=12840l12840l1l15334l1l1l0l0l0l0l167l167l0.1l1l0
or click here for hyper adaptationism links
And that's just restricting myself to infant diet. To apply infant diet considerations to adults is an even bigger leap.
(Why does the idea of drinking breast milk slightly disgust me? Genes or upbringing?)
Is human breast milk considered a dairy food?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=QUN25NjLnP0
It's an optimal diet for a baby. I'm not a baby. Despite what that congressman who was against stem cell research said, I am not a 672 month old fetus. I am....an adult....woman!
(Point Break: I...am...an...FBI...agent!!!)
While we are on this amazing subject, did you know that the components of breast milk are different in the first few sucks, the middle sucks, and the last? They are. I learned this reading about some non-profit that shipped breast milk from volunteers to babies in 3rd world conflict zones that had lost their moms, tragically. This was to save them from infant formula. Evolution is amazing.
From a cup, anyway.
IIRC from longer ago, dairy was said to be somehow protective so lo-fatter Pritikin went to observe autopsies on milk drinking Maasai and found significant atheroma.
OTOH, I remember some study from several years ago about a colony of Greeks in Australia. Their health was similar to Greeks in Greece, even though they had mainly replaced olive oil with local butter.
so the evidence goes back and forth, as usual.
@FTD thanks, I did watch 'King Corn' last night.
Skim it is! He likes it, and it's one of the few proteins he'll eat.
I've slowly learned to be wary of dogma.
on a side note. My mantra is eat nutrients, not calories... now when it comes to low fat dairy the problem is that there are no nutrients left, so that it stands out of question that you should neither eat nor drink 0.2% "yoghurt" or 0.2% "milk"
Milk is cow titty snot, but honey is bee spit, and neither of those come close to the weirdest things eaten--poached embryos, bird's nests, spicy live caterpillars, gelatin, bread mold, moss.
Much less likely to grow fungus and bacteria than milk.
Supposedly some honey found in Egyptian tombs was till edible.
What I've learned is that brushing and flossing are very important for the prevention of dental caries.
@Melissa: I'm comparing commercially available dairy which has been pretty much the same since I've been alive. My generation drank full fat milk and wasn't obese, but the notion that drinking low fat milk has caused an epidemic because we've "replaced" that bit of fat with carbs is ludicrous. Hence this post :)
@shatfat: Yeah, I'm not dissing full-fat dairy, more sticking up for "natural" low-fat versions that are needlessly dissed in LLVLClue land. I'm a big fan of trying to get my nutrients from whole foods rather than supplements, but there are always trade-offs.
"Milk is cow titty snot, but honey is bee spit, and neither of those come close to the weirdest things eaten--poached embryos, bird's nests, spicy live caterpillars, gelatin, bread mold, moss."
Yes, but Winnie the Poo poached honey (and animals do), animals poach eggs from nests. I've never seen an adult animal latch onto the teat of a lactating other-species animal. That's what I mean by the "when I think about it". You'll never get me to eat unprocessed organ meats -- but I'll eat liverwurst. Why? Because I've processed the livers produced by autopsies and removed from rodents and such. I just cannot cook a liver and even imagine slicing and chewing such a thing. I'd probably eat a grub first.
Diana you know that all the crowded teeth and cavities are due to excess carbs and reduced fat diets now. That's why all those SAD-eating fat American kids have fewer cavities.
Post a Comment
Comment Moderation is ON ... I will NOT be routinely reviewing or publishing comments at this time..