A Quote of the Day ...
... from my Inbox:
"What happens when smart people may be smart in one field (domain specificity) but are not smart in an entirely different field, out of which may arise weird beliefs. When Harvard marine biologist Barry Fell jumped fields into archaeology and wrote a best-selling book, America B.C.: Ancient Settlers in the New World (1976) about all the people who discovered America before Columbus, he was woefully unprepared and obviously unaware that archaeologists had already considered his different hypotheses of who first discovered America (Egyptians, Greeks, Roman, Phoenicians, etc.) but rejected them for lack of credible evidence. This is a splendid example of the social aspects of science, and why being smart in one field does not make one smart in another. Science is a social process, where one is trained in a certain paradigm and works with others in the field. A community of scientists reads the same journals, goes to the same conferences, reviews one anothers' papers and books, and generally exchanges ideas about the facts, hypotheses, and theories in that field. Through vast experience they know, fairly quickly, which new ideas stand a chance of succeeding and which are obviously wrong. Newcomers from other fields, who typically dive in with both feet without the requisite training and experience, proceed to generate new ideas that they think—because of their success in their own field—will be revolutionary. Instead, they are usually greeted with disdain (or, more typically, simply ignored) by the professionals in the field. This is not because (as they usually think is the reason) insiders don't like outsiders (or that all great revolutionaries are persecuted or ignored), but because in most cases those ideas were considered years or decades before and rejected for perfectly legitimate reasons."
~ from: Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudoscience, Superstition, and Other Confusions of Our Time by Michael Shermer.I think this applies to Gary Taubes, but also many of the purveyors of Science Krispies I blog about here.
Comments
Perhaps there is a secret society at harvard where graduates compete against each other to see who can switch fields, come up with the wackiest theory and sell the most books.
> notions of accuracy of recall regarding what did or did not 'happen'
I just realized John Mack could have used a Jack Kruse quantum mechanic seminar. Co-presented by some ESPers, Oprah/Robbins/Law of Attraction pushers.
just read it again: it'll jump up and smack you in the face, it so badly BEGS for "quantum observer/observed" and the related "we create reality" woo,
> notions of accuracy of recall regarding what did or did not 'happen'
This is the review of his book Why We Get Fat taken from Skeptic magazine Vol.16 No.3: http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/why-we-get-fat/
I really like what you guys tend to be up too. This type of
clever work and reporting! Keep up the good works guys I've incorporated you guys
to my own blogroll.
I every time used to study post in news papers
but now as I am a user of web therefore from now I am using net for content, thanks to web.
analyzing these kinds of things, so I am going to let know her.
Also visit my web page ... click here ()
Air Hockey TableIf you're thinking criminal case cheat of many popular
arcade games etc. Use cars to use this word solver will provide excellent operating facility for High-end mobile games are becoming so popular that
people are also very strong. The game has its own charm which definitely creates enthusiasm
in the UI, enhancing graphics and reverberating sound effects and exclusive shots.
Listed below is a really high score, all for
the movie.
my homepage - farmville 2 country escape cheats
I'm definitely enjoying the information. I'm bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my
followers! Wonderful blog and fantastic design and style.
My web page - doubledown casino promo codes ()
Post a Comment
Comment Moderation is ON ... I will NOT be routinely reviewing or publishing comments at this time..