A Great Quote
This comes from the Reebok/Crossfit page on Facebook. In response to a photo of Neal Maddox eating a donut, Tom Inkel writes:
One of the rewards of a good diet, fitness level, and self-awareness is knowing what licenses like this that you can take without impacting your goals. I feel bad for people trying to live blindly by some set of rigid rules for life that they've conjured up off CrossFit/Paleo websites. As humans, we have a limited pool of free will/willpower. (Read Dan John's book sometime: Never Let Go.) If you use that willpower up on unnecessary rigidity, two things happen: (1) other parts of your life fall apart to compensate (and eventually, your rule system itself); (2) you alienate from CrossFit/Paleo everyone watching who can't make those same commitments (due to things like a crazy schedule, kids, sickness, etc.), because you've just told them that they aren't good enough for CrossFit/Paleo because they can't do it "right." That's tragic. Especially since, someday, it might be you with the new kid, and you're trapped by your own logic into not being a "good" CrossFitter. In summary: Rules are just tools. Don't let them blind you to goals. That's not CrossFit or health; that's religious fanaticism. Instead: Start with specific accomplishments in mind; measure your progress regularly; and only then, tailor rules as necessary.
I know there probably aren't too many CrossFitters reading this, but there are lots of dietary/lifestyle absolutists out there for whom we can switch out the CrossFit/Paleo label and this would speak to you. I think these are words of wisdom -- paraphrase: Don't use your energies up on complying with self-imposed rigid rules.
There is too much emphasis, IMO, placed on what we should not do, why we shouldn't do it, and the necessary amount of contrition that must be expressed if we are impure in our ways ... or worse yet occasionally engage in the "don'ts" unapologetically. Life is too short.
Comments
When you learn to unwind your cravings for all the "bad" stuff and change the way you think about them, they lose their appeal. At that point, you don't need to exert willpower to resist them.
It's like being a smoker vs. a non-smoker. How hard is it for a non-smoker to pass on a cigarette? It's effortless, of course. The trick is to become a non-smoker or a non-donut eater.
Last Christmas someone had left a big tin of sugar cookies in the break room for all to enjoy. I walked past the thing three times before I recognized that it was food. It could have been a basket of candles as far as I was concerned. In the past I would have eaten way too many and obsessed over getting more. Now there isn't even any temptation to resist.
If you are going to exert any effort, put it into analyzing your thoughts and feelings and identifying the environmental cues trigger your cravings. Once you change those, your behavioral changes become effortless.
ugh ... or KFC ...
> Evelyn aka CarbSaneMay 28, 2012 6:59 AM
> @Sanjeev -- I await your diet book: The HURL diet -- Harness Utter Revulsion for Life. :D
LOL - the perfect complementary set crossfit and rhabdo and the HURL diet.
http://www.france24.com/en/20121026-german-doctors-remove-28-kg-tumour-woman
I think the spirit of this quote is not quite as good out of context of all of the comments on that picture. Lots of "he's setting a bad example" (for the kids) type stuff. Well, how bad an example? They say the same about Phelps, and ohhhh the horror stories out of the Olympic and that gymnast practically apologizing to Michele Obama for "treating" herself to an egg mcmuffin? People seem to be missing the point that, I'm sorry, it can't be that unhealthy if these elite athletes can perform at the level they do -- requiring mental acuity as well!
This is true! It's true for many LC/paleo/whatever foods as well in my experience -- e.g.nuts. It's that "moreish" quality as Nigel would say.
But rigid, sometimes arbitrary, restrictions set people up for binging on crap, and that's way more unhealthy.
The benefit of a 'paleo' approach is that it is (and should), be SIMPLE. Simplicity boosts adherence. Being lean and active makes eating the occasional sugary foods negligible in terms of body composition.
The word 'guilt' should not fall in the same breath as 'diet'.
Good one! I feel a quote of my own coming on. Something like "nothing is more damaging to one's health than damage control measures taken to correct for supposedly damaging deviations from ones diet." -- Not quite catchy yet :D
I wonder if the same people would believe the justification for supplements that spewed on bodybuilding sites[2] most based on single rat studies or molecular pathway studies or studies that raised testosterone levels in post menopausal women.
It's the same level/rigour/standard of proof ... one wonders how people can compartmentalize so well.
[0] no (whole body)/ (whole system)/ (clincally significant) controlled trials
[2] "site" meaning advertising spread over a ton of html pages posing as "information" or "impartial advice"
:)
Yeah, there's an app for that. Um, I mean 'there's a study for that'!
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9831574
I've been waiting for an opportunity to mention the above diet. Of course, the 'milk plus one designated food daily' is going to be my choice... and I'd still lose weight. Easy to remember, easy to obtain the foodstuffs, no special items (or brands) to buy and two days, I get to eat all I want of a favorite food. How awesome is that!
Reminds me of a number of other diets that are novel and 'easy to follow' because the rules are easy to understand.
Then simply divide by 4 to get daily glucose allowance = 50 to 85 grams per day. Oh dear.
Post a Comment
Comment Moderation is ON ... I will NOT be routinely reviewing or publishing comments at this time..