Jimmy Moore's latest NuttyK Update
Yep folks, more lies! I'll send you to Facebook for this update ;-) , you'll see why in a minute. Well Jimmy has lost a bit more weight and is now at 240.2 which puts him at the brink of seeing a 23_ on the scale any day now. This means he's now only 10 lbs over his "goal weight" from 2004.
However, he has lied once again to his readers when in his blog post he says
My current weight of 240.2 is the lowest I’ve been since I started this experiment and I’m within a whisker of being back in the 230′s again…something I haven’t seen since 2006.
Umm. Not true. And I'd love to hear the speculation as to why he would lie like this ... repeatedly ... about something he hasn't purged from the internet and of which there is such a clear record!
He lied, even to David Duke!, about his low weight achieved, which was at least twice 215 lbs (one of those times 2-3 pounds less than that), and he was in the 220's long enough to have "owned" that milestone, yet he doesn't.
Since he got close to 250 he's claimed he hadn't seen that weight in 5 years, despite a picture showing he weighed 248 and change after his 6 day fast fail (April 2011) on his website! This is more in the web of lies that has included, since I "met" him in 2009 his repeated assertions that he was never able to shake his creatine weight gain in late 2007-early 2008 despite weighing in the 230's for a few months in 2009.
So now he makes the claim that he hasn't weighed in the 230's since 2006. Huh? How can he forget weighing under 215 after KimKins in Summer 2007?? I mean an episode that dramatic is hardly forgettable! Or that he started 2007 weighing 220. Or that he came so close in 2009 to his "elusive" 230 lbs by weighing in at 236 and change that January?!!
It all seems to be part and parcel of moving the bar, I imagine to fool newcomers into believing he's in uncharted territory when he's been here again, and again, and again. Why is it that nobody else other than Regina Wilshire dares to point this out to him ... or the rest of us for that matter? Of course with his censoring of comments on his blog, few will know the truth. There is no honesty in LLVLC-land.
One of the more hilarious things is that Jimmy wrote on FB:
"I've been tracking with my food intake, exercise, blood sugar, blood ketones and weight to analyze it and attempt to have it published as a case study in a scientific medical journal.Oh ... I see that's also been changed to:
With the new year here, I'm focused now more than ever before on finishing strong on this experiment. A researcher has already agreed to take all my data I've been tracking with my food intake, exercise, blood sugar, blood ketones and weight to analyze it and attempt to have it published as a case study in a scientific medical journal. AWESOME!Any serious researcher who would even consider doing this in any reputable science journal is nuts!
Comments
http://www.lef.org/newsletter/2013/0208_Insulin-Use-By-Diabetics-Associated-With-Greater-Risk-Of-Dying.htm
Professor Craig J. Currie of Cardiff University and his associates evaluated data from the UK General Practice Research Database, 2000-2010 for 84,622 patients with type 2 diabetes who received glucose-lowering drugs. Subjects were treated with metformin, sulfonylurea drugs, insulin, metformin plus sulfonylureas, or metformin and insulin for no less than 180 days.
Compared with those who used metformin alone, treatment with sulfonylurea drugs was associated with a 43.6 percent greater risk of experiencing an initial adverse cardiac event or cancer, or death from any cause during the decade examined. For insulin alone, the risk was 80 percent higher and for insulin combined with metformin, the risk was 31 percent higher. Among those with no prior history of the events, insulin therapy was associated with nearly twice the risk of heart attack, a 73.6 percent higher risk of major adverse cardiac events, a 43.2 percent greater risk of stroke, a 43.7 greater risk of developing cancer, 3.5 times the risk of kidney complications, and more than twice the risk of neuropathy or dying from any cause in comparison with the risks experienced by those who used metformin.
"By reviewing data from CPRD between 1999 and 2011 we've confirmed there are increased health risks for patients with type 2 diabetes who take insulin to manage their condition," stated Dr Currie, who is affiliated with Cardiff University's School of Medicine.
(Confession: I keep up with American popular culture by reading Gawker, and I can't tell you how many times I've seen very similar cycles rolled out there whenever some celebrity or non-celebrity or politician says something stupid on Facebook or in front of a camera.)
____
because counting calories is just TOO TOO HARD, one must stab one's self multiple times PER DAY and spend ... HOW MUCH !?!?!!?!?! on test strips
"out of the frying pan, into Fukishima's reactor core ... "
> agreed to take all my data
Anyone feel some Henny Young jokes coming down the pike?
____
Thanks for bringing up some undigested 80s chuck ...
Jimmy Moore, the Jim part of "the Jim & Tammy Fae of weight loss".
Next up: a Keto theme park.
Metformin simply being a better drug (it actually treats an underlying pathology)
Or metformin is the first line of defence and the people taking insulin have more severe diabetes
Though I wouldn't be surprised if very high insulin levels have several undesirable effects
I agree, It's a study using the data from GP registers. Insulin is normally introduced after met and then med +sulfs have 'failed' (and anecdotally, insulin is often used as a threat so often resisted) It'snot really surprising that these people faired worst
Interesting Sanjeev -- I think of that analogy often. And I guess that bodes well for the Jimster because his namesake had(s) another church even after doing time for the PTL crimes.
My guess would be (a) he doesn't want to remind people of the Kimkins debacle (b) per Susanne, it helps his message to look like a suffering sinner but it doesn't help to look like a man who simply has no control and who careens wildly from one extreme to the other.
Whatever.
1/27 241.8 240.8
1/28 243.8 242.___
1/29 244.4 242.6
1/30 243.4 241.6
1/31 244 242.8
2/1 243 241.4
He didn't even keep his two charts straight.
It is interesting how he is surprised to be fitting clothes at 240 that he wore at 230. He attributes this to all that musckle he's built over the years. Must be hard to reconcile with his 35% BF vs. that 11% he used to boast over!
Now that was funny!
I don't need a science degree to see that's worthless.
I'd worry about the education and caliber of said researcher...
Speaking for myself, however, anecdotal claims made on the internet are to be taken skeptically because it is impossible to verify most. It is one reason I have made a deliberate effort to separate my own from "science posts". But in Jimmy's case, despite years of (now deleted) daily menus blogs indicating otherwise, Jimmy claims nothing he did prior to NuttyK worked for him. That he gained weight inexplicably and suddenly in Dec 2007 and could never get a handle on it followed by more slow, steady gains. This is a lie. We know he'll get up and repeat that lie as his wife sits in the audience and later joins him on stage.
Will the documentation in this case study include his urinary tract infection? Protein and crystals in his urine? The main thing is that case studies are not "epic biohacks", however diligently documented, shopped around to screenwriters (MD or PhD) to develop a concept to shop around to the studios (peer review journals).
Post a Comment
Comment Moderation is ON ... I will NOT be routinely reviewing or publishing comments at this time..