How Fatty Diets Cause Diabetes
How Fatty Diets Cause Diabetes
This was the provocative title of the Science Daily piece that made a minor splash across the LC web recently. Perhaps overshadowed by the AHS drama and fallout, but nonetheless picked up on by a number of people. The article begins with:
Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetics tend to have one thing in common: obesity. Exactly how diet and obesity trigger diabetes has long been the subject of intense scientific research. A new study led by Jamey D. Marth, Ph.D., director of the Center for Nanomedicine, a collaboration between the University of California, Santa Barbara and Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute (Sanford-Burnham), has revealed a pathway that links high-fat diets to a sequence of molecular events responsible for the onset and severity of diabetes.
The article is referring to the journal article linked below:
Pathway to diabetes through attenuation of pancreatic beta cell glycosylation and glucose transport (or request access)
Abstract:
A connection between diet, obesity and diabetes exists in multiple species and is the basis of an escalating human health problem. The factors responsible provoke both insulin resistance and pancreatic beta cell dysfunction but remain to be fully identified. We report a combination of molecular events in human and mouse pancreatic beta cells, induced by elevated levels of free fatty acids or by administration of a high-fat diet with associated obesity, that comprise a pathogenic pathway to diabetes. Elevated concentrations of free fatty acids caused nuclear exclusion and reduced expression of the transcription factors FOXA2 and HNF1A in beta cells. This resulted in a deficit of GnT-4a glycosyltransferase expression in beta cells that produced signs of metabolic disease, including hyperglycemia, impaired glucose tolerance, hyperinsulinemia, hepatic steatosis and diminished insulin action in muscle and adipose tissues. Protection from disease was conferred by enforced beta cell–specific GnT-4a protein glycosylation and involved the maintenance of glucose transporter expression and the preservation of glucose transport. We observed that this pathogenic process was active in human islet cells obtained from donors with type 2 diabetes; thus, illuminating a pathway to disease implicated in the diet- and obesity-associated component of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
In a nutshell, the elevated NEFA they observed in an obese mouse model led to a disruption in glucose transport in beta cells, and this same defect is seen in the islet cells donated by humans with type 2 diabetes. The mechanism seems to be elevated NEFA → reduced expression of certain genes → impaired glucose transport. I'm a bit backlogged with other interests to look into this very detailed paper as regards all the exact details here, but I think the following excerpts are sufficient to get the gist.
... Pancreatic beta cell dysfunction is also a diagnostic determinant of type 2 diabetes and includes defective insulin secretion exemplified by the loss of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). Normally, beta cells sense elevations of blood glucose by expressing cell surface glucose transporters that enable concentration-dependent glucose transport across the plasma membrane. This is followed by glucokinase action and ultimately calcium-dependent insulin secretion. Loss of GSIS has been linked to impaired beta cell glucose transporter (Glut) expression among animal models, and failure of GSIS has been proposed to further provoke the pathogenic onset of type 2 diabetes in humans. ...
... Genetics, diet and obesity contribute to the current epidemic of human type 2 diabetes. A substantial proportion of the human population seems predisposed to a combination of these factors, perhaps analogous to different mouse strains that are resistant or susceptible to diet- and obesity-induced diabetes31. Our findings show that the extent of disruption of beta cell glycosylation and glucose transport by diet and obesity directly contributes to disease onset and severity in susceptible mice, illuminating a pathogenic pathway that encompasses lipotoxicity and glucotoxicity32. This pathway seems to be conserved in normal human islet cells and is activated in islets from donors with type 2 diabetes. A pathogenic tipping point in this pathway may occur when elevated free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations impair the expression and function of FOXA2 and HNF1A transcription factors sufficiently in beta cells to deplete GnT-4a glycosylation and glucose transporter expression. The resulting dysfunction of beta cells leads to impaired glucose tolerance and failure of GSIS and further contributes to hyperglycemia, hepatic steatosis and systemic insulin resistance. Preservation of beta cell GnT-4a glycosylation and glucose transporter expression breaks this pathogenic cycle and its link to diet and obesity.
This paper is actually yet another one providing evidence in support of the Fatty Acid Hypothesis for how obesity can cause insulin resistance and diabetes. It does not go into how fat cells become IR first, but rather deals with the mechanism by which the resulting elevation in circulating NEFA leads to pancreatic beta cell dysfunction. That being interfering with glucose transport to the beta cell so your pancreas does not properly sense hyperglycemia.
In my opinion, the title and implications of the Science Daily article are irresponsible, but so too are the knee-jerk responses of many of those favoring low carb high fat diets. It should always be remembered that NEFA is not the equivalent of dietary fat. A high fat diet does not necessarily impact NEFA. However, two articles by Keith Frayn I've discussed here previously, Adipose Tissue as Buffer ... and Fatty Acid Trafficking, present the scenario whereby dietary fatty acids can contribute significantly to NEFA levels. Additionally, VLC diets fail to suppress NEFA release in the postprandial period.
Several are dismissing this whole thing out of hand. The usual "well the high fat diet also has carbs" argument abounds. Perhaps a better title for the article might be How Fattening Diets Cause Diabetes. Clearly some are more genetically predisposed, or all obese would be diabetic which is not the case. But perhaps instead of T2 or NIDDM or "adult onset" diabetes, we can use Diabesity or OIDM (obesity induced diabetes mellitus) as a designation. If your high fat/carb/calorie junky SAD → obesity → elevated NEFA and you are genetically predisposed, it will lead to hyperglycemia. The solution? Stop eating carbs to control the hyperglycemia? Yes, that works (for some, to some degree), but it doesn't appear to restore beta cell function without substantial weight loss. And of all the anecdotal reports of those doing longterm VLC are worth considering it seems the reports of becoming more and more carb intolerant indicate persisting beta cell dysfunction. Considering all of the other important functions of insulin in the body, it may be worthwhile looking at another approach long term. JMO.
Comments
I lean toward the view that these two views are not necessarily mutually exclusive or incompatible with each other.
I agree that excess fat (Especially visceral fat)pumps out nasty inflammatory thinga-ma-jingies that can lead to insulin resistance.
But we also see that Southeast Asians seem to become diabetic while relatively LEAN.
So that indicates to me that being overweight is only one potential pathway to insulin resistance/diabetes - since some lean folks do in fact develop insulin resistance.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19833882?dopt=Abstract
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21282101
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20934404/
http://robbwolf.com/2011/08/18/of-mice-and-morons/
You say these are not mutually exclusive and I would agree to an extent. I believe that in the vast majority of cases when obesity is associated IR, however, a certain degree of obesity occurs first, then a significant level of IR/compensation exacerbates the situation leading to more weight gain. When NEFA are elevated, both glucose uptake and oxidation are impaired and this is why I believe so many folks report "problems" eating carbs in that state and why LC works quite well -- seemingly better the more obese/IR the person.
Sue, what you say is consistent with Frayn's FAH. Indeed the FAH seems consistent with pretty much every observation of non-autoimmune/injury induced beta cell function forms of diabetes. It appears Robb didn't read the full text? I'm going to post a link and a comment there. Let's see how that goes. :-)
@Lucas: I'll have a look!
- I certainly agree that NEFA plays a part.
- The "ionic theory" of insulin resistance/metabolic-syndrome tells that something as "simple" as a mere magnesium or potassium deficiency can have PROFOUND effects upon one's ability to handle glucose.
- Lack of Chromium (Sometimes referred to as "glucose tolerance factor") can also be part of the downward spiral in insulin sensitivity. Also lack of vanadium and B vitamins.
- Excess iron (More common in men and post-menopausal females) can also cause hepatic insulin resistance. But don't tell that to all those LC dieters awash in a sea of iron rich red-meats.
- One of the biggest causes of insulin resistance in skeletal muscle tissue is intra-muscular triglycerides
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8769349
- Not exercising muscles also causes them to be less receptive to insulin's effects.
- Lack of D3 (VERY Common these days, particularly in darker skinned folks.)
- Sleep deprivation has a MAJOR effect upon insulin sensitivity for the worse
- "They" used to say that caffeine reduced the risk of getting diabetes, but more recent evidence strongly suggests that it actually makes one LESS insulin sensitive.
- Mental stress
- Etc. etc.
Kind of a "witch's brew" of factors all conspiring to mess up people's insulin sensitivity.
Perhaps we should call the 80% of those diagnosed with hyperglycemia that are obese as diabesitetics. The overwhelming factor that led to their disease is obesity and the overwhelming evidence that the initiating factor in how obesity -> IR and hyperglycemia is NEFA.
I've got a post in the works regarding some of those other factors, cause/effect, etc.
From all the examples you give it looks like insulin resistance is not the problem but part of the body's solution
If IR is a solution I doubt it ... an obese person with good insulin sensitivity would not be able to lose fat ... in this case Taubes would be right about insulin blocking fat loss.
http://www.marksdailyapple.com/does-a-high-fat-diet-cause-type-2-diabetes/
For your take on it. I'm not sure.
> conspiring to mess up people's
> insulin sensitivity.
IMHO Peoples' insulin sensitivity seems to be what it needs to be for optimal health UNDER THE GIVEN CONSTRAINTs (the things you list).
It's like the body's a math student. Start by writing down the givens, do what you need to do with tools you have to get the required (optimal health).
Another way to look at it: Once we can measure insulin level and resistance easily and routinely at the moment should we develop drugs to get rid of the IR?
I was just wondering, and I apologise if you have covered this... in general, what are the differences between obese/T1D/T2D/healthy individuals in regards to insulin response to glucose intake? e.g. if one of each of the above "categories" of folks were to eat 25g glucose, how would their insulin responses differ in terms of magnitude, length and effectiveness at reducing blood glucose? Perhaps this is basic stuff, but you seem to have an amazing knowledge of it and a great ability to explain complex things simply, so I thought you might be the best person to ask!
Thanks and love your blog!
T1 (and any form of acute onset diabetes resulting from disease/injury/autoimmune attack): no pp insulin response or basal insulin production, rampant hyperinsulinemia pp and fasting -> insulin therapy absolute necessity!
Normal insulin sensitive: Appropriate to keep BG in range (this changes in the context of the size and composition of a meal, time since the last meal and its size, etc.)
Mild insulin resistance/compensator: Likely elevated fasting and pp insulin to keep NEFA and BG in normal range. Apparently some folks live their whole lives in this state to no detriment! They test normal.
"Diagnosed IR" with elevated fasting BG ("prediabetic") and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT - pp BG spikes and/or takes longer to come down to fasting), more elevated fasting insulin, elevated pp insulin response but can no longer completely compensate. Still keeping things sort of under control ...
As things progress, in the "common T2 diobesabetic*", the pp insulin response diminishes and pp glucose spikes get worse until they reach a certain level so as to be considered frank diabetes. Hepatic IR likely progresses concurrently and FBG goes up as well.
As the disease progresses further and beta cell mass declines, the T2 essentially becomes a T1.
Hope this helps.
*I think I'm going to settle on this term for obesity induced diabetes: diobesabetic
I'm not CarbSane, but I think it looks a little like this:
Obese and not diabetic: insulin-resistant but produces enough insulin to maintain normal glucose: beta cells and insulin production increase to meet demand.
T1D: not insulin-resistant (at least at outset - can become so if weight gain occurs when on exogenous insulin); do not produce insulin on their own. (Caveat: There are some slow-onset autoimmune diabetics for whom insulin production is reduced for a time before complete beta cell failure.)
T2D: insulin-resistant and has a degree of beta-cell failure: beta cells produce insulin, but not enough to meet increased demand. (The degree of impairment varies and tends to deteriorate over time, requiring insulin-stimulating drugs or exogenous insulin.) (Note that T2D is probably not just one disease but many - with the insulin resistance or impaired insulin production resulting from different mutations that weaken various parts of the glucose-sensing-signalling system. (That's a very unscientific way to put it - I'm no scientist.)
Healthy individuals have neither insulin resistance nor an insulin deficit.
There are also more unusual forms of diabetes. Some are mitochondrial and highly heredity - often occurs with partial deafness; others result from monogenic mutations (these have traditionally been termed "MODY" or mature-onset diabetes of the young - a misnomer) affecting genes controlling enzymes and transcription factors controlling various aspects of the glucose/insulin system. Some types of MODY are mild and static, others can be quite severe and deteriorate over time. These more unusual types often get misdiagnosed as Type I or Type II.
There may be more overlap among different types of diabetes than has been thought. There may be an autoimmune component of at least some forms of Type II diabetes; mitochondrial dysfunction is also apparent in Type II diabetes; mutations affecting some of the same pathways are present in some forms of MODY and some Type II diabetics; weight gain might precipitate LADA in some people, a version of Type I (Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adulthood).
For more information on Type II, MODY, and LADA forms of diabetes, I highly recommend Jenny Ruhl's web site http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/ and blog http://diabetesupdate.blogspot.com/.
--------
But I really was logging on to say this....
Carb tolerance does go down on a low-carb diet, but this is temporary. I haven't heard of its leading to permanent impairment. It's part of the body's attempt to prevent hypoglycemia - one produces less insulin if the body is used to fewer carbs - it takes a few days of higher-carb eating to increase it.
The rationale for diabetics eating a low-carb diet is that their insulin response is already blunted, so you are lowering the carb load to what the body can handle. (Or reducing the amount of exogenous insulin required if insulin-dependent.) In diabetics with significant beta-cell failure, ratcheting up the carbs won't result in compensation from the beta cells - it will just result in higher blood glucose.
There are some diabetics for whom beta cell failure perhaps isn't the primary problem - the problem is either insulin resistance or impaired glucose signalling, which can be further impaired by excess dietary fat. To make matters more confusing, it seems probable that many Type II diabetics have a problem with fat blunting insulin sensitivity or insulin signalling *and* beta cell failure.
I seem to be the type who does better with less fat and more high-fiber carbs. Apparently, there's no one solution for everyone.
I'm looking forward to the day when we can hold up our finger to a scanner and have our genes read, including the ones that are switched on or off, so we don't have to bang around in the dark wondering what treatment is best for treating what is a very heterogeneous disease.
I would like to see this "very heterogenous" disease at LEAST be studied and treated for it's known subclasses by current knowledge. Clearly a large chunk share a similar etiology and progression. But I used to ask folks who were diagnosed what their testing was like and some were diagnosed on a single FBG! Perhaps they are exaggerating and there was a history building up to that or whatever, but back around 2 years ago when I was doing IF diligently I had my FBG go up a bit with no rhyme or reason to well within pre-diabetic range (mid 1-teens) here and there. Most of the time it was in the comfy 80's and I think my highest pp BG (after a big carby Mexican meal) was somewhere in the high 130's, yet had I happened to go to the doc those days ... I'm also shocked to be told that it is apparently not routine for an OGTT to measure not just BG but also insulin. Again, perhaps these folks aren't telling the whole story but how can a doctor treat a "diabetic" without knowing at least the basic cause of their hyperglycemia.
This is what bothers me about metformin -- the golden child diabetes drug -- it's great for certain things but totally ineffective for others. Rather than experimenting on the patient with a bunch of drugs to see what works, why not at least gather all the info possible first?
'Unlike metabolically damaged humans, who tend to have rock-bottom HDL cholesterol and rising triglycerides, some mice experience higher HDL and unchanged (or reduced!) triglycerides when eating the diets that make them diseased (PDF). This points to some clear differences between how humans and mice experience diet-induced metabolic problems.'
Just today, I saw this in my e-mail from NCBI:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20814413
Should the following:
"rampant hyperinsulinemia pp and fasting -> insulin therapy absolute necessity"
Read this?
"rampant HYPOinsulinemia pp and fasting -> insulin therapy absolute necessity!"
Have you seen these 'ancient' observations?
http://www.jbc.org/content/80/2/461.full.pdf
On their traditional very low carbohydrate diet, Inuits had excellent glucose tolerance. After fasting though, they saw the horror curves we see in many modern day low carbers. What the heck is the confounder?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1924390/pdf/canmedaj01278-0010.pdf
Weird.
My guess: dairy. Introduce milk and you got glucose intolerance. Both the hospitalized Inuit and modern day low carbers were/are exposed to dairy and both were/are glucose intolerant. Free living (traditional) Inuit and modern day 'paleo's' were/are not. Any other suggestions to explain the observations in these two links?
I'll have a look at the other paper when I get a chance. :)
Melchior's first link above is interesting. The Inuit in that study had exceptional glucose tolerance. They also ate an average of almost 300g protein/day, roughly half their calories. I was just remembering that protein increases IGF-1 levels and would add this may be at play in this population as well: http://carbsanity.blogspot.com/2011/06/protein-insulin-like-growth-factor-1.html
I don't believe a VLC/VHF diet is optimal in maintenance. Although since lipids are less toxic w/o the hyperglycemia, I suppose eating such a diet will at least delay progression for a bit.
p.s. I think one of the most interesting aspects, though, when recommending any of these diets is considering the cognitive effects they present on the subject (i.e. lower fat associated with more depression). Any opinions in this area would also be greatly appreciated.
By the way, all your posts are superb and probably most fun to respond to =)
Post a Comment
Comment Moderation is ON ... I will NOT be routinely reviewing or publishing comments at this time..