I'm much less confused now!
So I listened to the Paleo Podcaster Roundup on Sean Croxton's Underground Wellness podcast guest hosted by Jimmy Moore. Here's the intro:
Guest host Jimmy Moore of the Livin' La Vida Low Carb Blog & Podcast returns to UW Radio for a roundtable with Paleo experts including Stefani Ruper, Dean Dwyer, Dr. Colin Champ, and Abel James. The gang discusses the importance of the Paleo and Real Food blogosphere, critiques of the low-carb diet, and important steps you can take to find the diet that is right for YOU.
Yeah, Sean's on vacation, so perhaps Jimmy wrote this up, but for starters, how in heck did this gang become experts in paleo all of a sudden? But ...
Half of the podcast was about ... podcasting.
Diet? What's paleo? Whole food. A low crap diet. Heck, they didn't even repeat the no grains no legumes meme that at least 90% of paleo seems to agree on (or maybe they mentioned it but I cannot listen again). I've gone to Ruper's site time and again and can find no definition what "paleo" even means to her. Folks eating real whole foods that grow from the ground (this was either Champ or Abel) does not require us to harken back to the paleolithic era!!
Controversy: Carbs! Champ gets all passionate: Just get off the addictive carbohydrates. Sugar is more addictive than cocaine. Carbs make you overeat. Most importantly, the people who have problems on LC are doing it wrong! Fer cryin' out loud, I'm SOOO sick of this nonsense. Jimmy started doing LC more "right" circa 2008 and piling the fat on his food ... remind us how he's faring?? And please, the ketogenic diets are NOT whole foods. Here's where paleo fantasy comes in again and again.
The money quote, asked by Jimmy about the popularity of paleo, Abel:
And now there's newcomer to the party, Stefani Ruper, out to enlighten us on the science of the paleo diet for women-specific issues, right? Sorry, she just doesn't count when it comes to science. She did one post on fasting for women, but one would be hard pressed to wade through the PFW site to find it under all the kickass womanhoodedness. More recently she got all excited that Mark Sisson is talking about female body fat. (There are some claims in his post that don't add up, but ...). Since Stefani started out the podcast discussing how she now felt confident bringing "honest science" and a voice to women in paleo, this is relevant. So in her recent post on female body fat we get:
I'll wrap this up discussing the paleo podcaster in chief, Jimmy Moore. What? You say he's not paleo? What? You say paleo is not low carb? Well, he is the biggest problem in the paleo=LC problem, antagonism, and all that jazz. Melissa Hartwig of Whole9 recently tweeted dismay about this presumed equivalence. I say to her and all paleos who have a problem with it, STOP going on his podcast!! Jimmy mentions how he used to be surprised how many of those who listen to one of his podcasts don't listen to another, or read his blog, etc. This is important ... because what picture did he send Sean to put on the podcast? Why the 2005 "thinker pose" ... and as he sat around discussing real food and even addressing crappy ingredients in LC foods, how many of these paleo peeps that may be called upon as guests realize their podcasts are being sponsored by Leaner Living and now Diets to Go prepackaged LC crap.
Do they care? It would appear not, and I'll leave you to ponder as to why that is. But thanks for clearing up any confusion I might have had ...
Half of the podcast was about ... podcasting.
Diet? What's paleo? Whole food. A low crap diet. Heck, they didn't even repeat the no grains no legumes meme that at least 90% of paleo seems to agree on (or maybe they mentioned it but I cannot listen again). I've gone to Ruper's site time and again and can find no definition what "paleo" even means to her. Folks eating real whole foods that grow from the ground (this was either Champ or Abel) does not require us to harken back to the paleolithic era!!
Controversy: Carbs! Champ gets all passionate: Just get off the addictive carbohydrates. Sugar is more addictive than cocaine. Carbs make you overeat. Most importantly, the people who have problems on LC are doing it wrong! Fer cryin' out loud, I'm SOOO sick of this nonsense. Jimmy started doing LC more "right" circa 2008 and piling the fat on his food ... remind us how he's faring?? And please, the ketogenic diets are NOT whole foods. Here's where paleo fantasy comes in again and again.
The money quote, asked by Jimmy about the popularity of paleo, Abel:
Now we have something to call it right, because you [Jimmy] started this long before paleo was known at least in this way as being what it is today as low carb but it's also subsumed all these other little groups. You know you have the real food people, body building, cross fitters, the science crowd, and so many people in between and on the fringe. So I think because we have all of these distinct groups banding together it gives us enormous power. That's promising stuff.Paleo is not low carb, and paleo cannot subsume other groups to form any sort of unified vision. This is why the symbolic gesture at AHS, where Robb Wolf and Mark Sisson joined WAPF was a hollow farce. But Abel, here's a newsflash: You DON'T have the science crowd. You don't want to address the science. Remember Jack Kruse Abel? Yeah, Abel's podcast shot to #2 on iTunes in one month for one reason, and one reason only: his podcast with known liar, scammer and science fictionist Jack Kruse. And he did make an appearance here at the Asylum (I guess he just has a really really long list of guests and hasn't gotten to me yet -- grin!). Ancestral could be a big tent to include paleo, but paleo can NEVER be a big tent to include "all those little fringe groups". This is the problem because those groups and personalities are NOT banding together, they're being asked to suck it up for the sake of the community and just STFU if they have anything but praise for its leaders. Nevermind that paleo and non-paleo types alike mangle and/or misrepresent science all the time and just flat out make sheet up.
And now there's newcomer to the party, Stefani Ruper, out to enlighten us on the science of the paleo diet for women-specific issues, right? Sorry, she just doesn't count when it comes to science. She did one post on fasting for women, but one would be hard pressed to wade through the PFW site to find it under all the kickass womanhoodedness. More recently she got all excited that Mark Sisson is talking about female body fat. (There are some claims in his post that don't add up, but ...). Since Stefani started out the podcast discussing how she now felt confident bringing "honest science" and a voice to women in paleo, this is relevant. So in her recent post on female body fat we get:
Women store fat in their abdomens during menopause fairly frequently. This is because estrogen levels are dropping sharply. Many women supplement with bio-identical hormones, in fact, and see their weight gain / weight shift minimize. Another great way to mitigate this problem is to eat a diet consisting of whole foods, which will minimize insulin spiking that can also contribute to abdominal fat gain, and which will also keep hormone levels fairly well-balanced.I don't blog much about abdominal fat in menopause, not because I don't have an interest in it, or haven't tried to research it, but because I've come across very little evidence in all of that research that diet can change much. Indeed my biggest disappointment with Eades 6 Week Cure was that it did not deliver on its promise of all the latest research on dietary interventions for abdominal fat, but rather that we learned offhand that Mary Dan used (uses) bioidentical hormones to address her middle aged middle. Whole foods and insulin spikes? Sigh. But gee ... where have I heard about female fat before? Why from Melissa McEwen at Hunt Gather Love . Indeed Mark cites that post, so it becomes increasingly odd how Ms. Paleo for Women, and Ms. Rise Up & Roar encouraging women to speak up for our issues, ignores women's voices and turns her back on them when there's male attentions, accolades and acknowledgement to be had instead. No blogroll of female paleo voices at PFW either, but I've gone on a bit of a tangent there ...
I'll wrap this up discussing the paleo podcaster in chief, Jimmy Moore. What? You say he's not paleo? What? You say paleo is not low carb? Well, he is the biggest problem in the paleo=LC problem, antagonism, and all that jazz. Melissa Hartwig of Whole9 recently tweeted dismay about this presumed equivalence. I say to her and all paleos who have a problem with it, STOP going on his podcast!! Jimmy mentions how he used to be surprised how many of those who listen to one of his podcasts don't listen to another, or read his blog, etc. This is important ... because what picture did he send Sean to put on the podcast? Why the 2005 "thinker pose" ... and as he sat around discussing real food and even addressing crappy ingredients in LC foods, how many of these paleo peeps that may be called upon as guests realize their podcasts are being sponsored by Leaner Living and now Diets to Go prepackaged LC crap.
Do they care? It would appear not, and I'll leave you to ponder as to why that is. But thanks for clearing up any confusion I might have had ...
Comments
No one knows what a "paleo" diet really is. If we did there wouldn't be so many variations.
Generally the only thing that the vast majority of people seem to agree on is that we should try to eliminate as much overly processed crap as we can - after that not much agreement.
Grains are good/grains are bad
Carbs are good/carbs are bad
Dairy is good/dairy is bad
Eat this/don't eat that
Fast one/two days per week/IF between 12-16 hours per day
Do this/don't do that
Take the red pill/take the blue pill
So much confusion
If I'm not mistaken, you're pointing at your meals together with your hubby as a factor that keeps you from becoming a supermodel? If macros didn't matter and "eat less" worked then it shouldn't be a problem, because one can always control the portion size.
I had similar experience - only after I got married I gained about 40 pounds. So this would offer a pretty good explanation of why JM is overweight? He's married, please take this into consideration when criticizing him :)
The same applies to Robb Wolf - I remember Durianrider pointing at his belly a couple years ago.
So how to reverse it phenomenon? My answer is kids - Robb has one and is lean now, I got two and lost what I had gained, Gary Taubes is lean and has kid(s) as far as I know, Mark Sisson.....
copy and paste to ensure yourself it's work safe:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:uNplgsGkJ3AJ:jhfowler.ucsd.edu/spread_of_obesity.pdf+&hl=en&gl=ca&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESiAr2hQvcdOsSAadnHGTgLN7wS_UYPpQdoxVOyMTQj_7UHnnVaKnP6BZCR54ALzzF5Vn2FA6fD6I2cWgsqQSOf-VfGHU6HUqaWlJRKli-I5wZJuIS3ZES1CHzLD3kAUUI-fAogu&sig=AHIEtbSPHkpbyGUwDJjV8_GvM1hq2oSaZA
google for more
copy & paste
https://www.google.ca/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=obesity+epidemic+modeling&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&redir_esc=&ei=qhFBUIuyNcqzygG-84DoCg#hl=en&client=ubuntu&hs=EFY&channel=fs&sclient=psy-ab&q=obesity+epidemic+modeling+spread+&oq=obesity+epidemic+modeling+spread+&gs_l=serp.3...42978.45337.0.45488.10.8.1.0.0.0.200.1057.2j5j1.8.0...0.0...1c.FwhPHZxRxKU&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=224690251ea67685&biw=1158&bih=788
Also your point about estrogen and bellyfat is right I would think, estrogen resists fat deposition in the waist/belly area, I seriously DOUBT any dietary intervention could make up for a loss of estrogen.
Its almost like saying dietary intervention could compensate for the loss of testosterone in a castrated man.
bollocks!!! :)
Does that preclude cooking?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egqf7k5Lzhk
If you can get over his tone of voice and bias and wade through a lot of his videos he actually dispels a lot of myths.
Can't forget though that body fat also produces estrogen. I'm inclined to think that in most cases body fat storage patterns are largely genetically determined and overall having any sort of hormone either in excess or deficit is going to be problematic. I would not recommend to an overweight person with abdominal fat that they gain some more fat to produce more estrogen, I would suggest losing fat mass.
http://www.plantpositive.com/blog/
Welcome to The Primitive Nutrition Series! Created by someone who was nearly seduced by the Paleo Diet idea before going vegan, these videos provide a wide-ranging response to the evolution-inspired rationale for meat eating which so many have uncritically accepted.
I keep thinking when I see this sort of thing that they're really missing the boat in terms of food reward. Now I'm just talking diet & weight loss here, but as Stephan G. has explained, it's food reward that keeps getting all this stuff into our/their mouths, leading to so much overeating amongst the LC-turned-faux'aleo crowd. They make these huge elaborate feasts, like the keto-egg & calorie bomb, without considering that replicating other high-reward foods such as pizza, just using almond flour & unrefined coconut butter is just a prettied up version of the basic problem: food reward, food reward & more food reward. Making it "paleo" may make the list of ingredients more recognizable to people like me than what you find on a typical frozen-pizza box label, but it's still a food that makes you want to eat it in excess, a calorie-laden high-reward dish, just classier & pricier. The lipstick on a pig analogy comes to mind.
http://plantpositive.squarespace.com/
but not the citations, you have to type the paper name from the video for that. I believe that is purposeful as many of the papers do not say what he says they do. Which is a common problem for paleo writers as well.
Might be true and probably is, at least partially.
But to be fair I'd point out the fact that, I don't have any idea about how old she was then nor what age she is now, I doubt she got younger since getting married.
How many are at 45 exactly at the same weight they were at age 23-25?
15%? Some gain little, some gain more, some gradually, some explode in the matter of time of 2-3 years.
Even among singles.
Those are no secrets.
http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/atlcx-episode-24-all-things-protein-protein-101-dr-donald-layman/15359
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=DK+Layman&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C31
Will Jimmy lower his butter/cream/coco-fat/lard/dripping ???
Highly doubtful. Ah well . . . . .
Slainte
Good for you, I suppose.
Still doesn't make it the norm.
Gaining half or more of your previous total body weight indicates to me that something is up aside from the passage of time.
For that matter, I'd argue that even when gaining "only" 25 pounds "something is up".
I apologise for my english, but I thought my premise was clear: I'd bet Carbsane is right.
But even more since the general correlation between age and weight stats is pretty obvious, I was stating that I strongly doubt writing "When Jimmy married his wife was sub 100 lbs. So his weight problems clearly caused her's..." is formally solid. Probably not even barely.
Plenty of women go from 50kg to 80kg, and for what I know JM is neither a mormon nor a muslim.
Outside of pathology, why do people gain weight? Why do people do anything? Our peers and environment and close relationships influence our outcomes tremendously. I agree that something is up with "only" 25 pounds [assuming the previous weight was healthy and the gain is fat mass] but when 50 or 60 is more than half your total previous weight it is a VERY significant gain. To make any sort of claim that this individual hasn't got a weight issue is...odd to say the least...but it's coming from a man with an ED.
Does anyone think her weight would be the same if she were married to Mark Sisson?
The Okinawan Diet: Health Implications of a Low-Calorie, Nutrient-Dense, Antioxidant-Rich Dietary Pattern Low in Glycemic Load
"Residents of Okinawa, the southernmost prefecture of Japan, are known for their long average life expectancy, high numbers of centenarians, and accompanying low risk of age-associated diseases. Much of the longevity advantage in Okinawa is thought to be related to a healthy lifestyle, particularly the traditional diet, which is low in calories yet nutritionally dense, especially with regard to phytonutrients in the form of antioxidants and flavonoids. Research suggests that diets associated with a reduced risk of chronic diseases are similar to the traditional Okinawan diet, that is, vegetable and fruit heavy (therefore phytonutrient and antioxidant rich) but reduced in meat, refined grains, saturated fat, sugar, salt, and full-fat dairy products."
"Although it is well known that the Japanese are the world's longest-lived people, less well known is that there is a Northeast-to-Southwest gradient in longevity, whereby the longest lived of the Japanese are those that inhabit the southernmost islands, known as the Ryukyu Islands (or Okinawa prefecture). Also known as the 47th prefecture of Japan, the citizens of Okinawa have the longest life expectancy within Japan (and likely the world), mainly because they avoid or delay major age-associated diseases such as cancer, heart disease, stroke, and diabetes."
"nsight into what constitutes the traditional Okinawan diet can be gained by examining the contents and cooking style of a traditional Okinawan meal. This would typically begin with Okinawan-style miso soup (water, miso paste, seaweed, tofu, sweet potato, and/or green leafy vegetables). The staple carbohydrate is the sweet potato (not rice, as in the Japanese diet). The main dish is a stir-fried vegetable dish (called champuru), which includes such vegetables as bitter melon (goya), accompanied by a side dish, such as konbu seaweed and konnyaku. This is typically simmered with a hint of oil, bonito dashi broth (for flavor), and small amounts of fish or boiled pork. Cooking styles center around vegetables and tofu. Smaller servings of fish, noodles, or lean meats with herbs, spices, and a little cooking oil may accompany these staples. Nbushi style uses water rich vegetables such as daikon (radish), Chinese okra, and pumpkin; seasons them with miso; and simmers them in their own juices. Irichi style uses a combination of simmering and stir-frying with less watery vegetables such as burdock, seaweed, dried daikon, or green papaya. The meal would be served with freshly brewed sanpin (jasmine) tea, occasionally followed with a small amount of locally brewed awamori (millet brandy).
As can be deduced from these descriptions of a typical meal, the traditional dietary pattern in Okinawa has the following characteristics:
1) High consumption of vegetables,
2) High consumption of legumes (mostly soy in origin),
3) Moderate consumption of fish products (especially in coastal areas),
4) Low consumption of meat and meat products,
5) Low consumption of dairy products,
6) Moderate alcohol consumption,
7) Low caloric intake,
8) Rich in omega-3 fats,
9) High monounsaturated-to-saturated-fat ratio, and
10) Emphasis on low-GI carbohydrates."
Traditional Okinawan diet food pyramid.
http://www.jacn.org/content/28/4_Supplement_1/500S/F2.expansion.html
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/andrew-weils-seasonal-supplements/
Dr. Weil is not a reliable source of health information. It’s unfortunate, because so much of his information is good, but he promiscuously interleaves science-based facts with belief-based opinions in such a way that laymen have no chance of distinguishing his wheat from his chaff.
He got his MD at Harvard but, instead of doing a residency, he dropped out, experimented with drugs, and went to live on an Indian reservation to study with a Sioux medicine man. Then he went on to become “the father of integrative medicine” and establish an empire. He has openly promoted “stoned thinking,” alleging that thoughts experienced while under the influence of psychedelic drugs or in altered states of consciousness are as valid as, or more valid than, scientific evidence. Arnold Relman explains all this and more in his article, “A Trip to Stonesville: Some Notes on Andrew Weil (1998),” available online and well worth reading.
Weil thinks his intuition trumps the results of clinical trials. For instance, he has seen improvement in children with ear infections after osteopathic manipulation (not surprising, since most ear infections resolve without treatment) and he continues to believe that cranial manipulation cures ear infections and to recommend that treatment to his followers even though there is no scientific evidence to support either its clinical usefulness or its fanciful underpinnings.
http://www.quackwatch.com/11Ind/weil.html
http://www.drweil.com/drw/u/id/ART00660
But I will mostly now love him forever for introducing me to both the Paleobiotics Lab and the concept of the Miocene Diet.
Rule #8: You are not a rural Okinawan.
"...Here's what long-lived people tend to have in common:
* They live in temperate regions with year-round sunlight.
* They grow up in poor farming communities with very little social or economic mobility.
* They live in multigeneration households, including grandparents.
* Their daily lives include long hours of repetitive labor. Nobody truly retires.
* If they need to get somewhere, they usually walk.
* Their diets are mostly vegetarian, with a predominance of cereal grains. They don't overeat, but I don't know if that is by choice or necessity. You can't eat too much of what you don't have.
* They tend to have low-stress lives with a strong sense of community.
Some of that sounds appealing. But how does it apply to your life of mine? Can you tell your boss, "You know, I think we should shift our best practices to the rural Okinawan model"? Would you want to live with your parents or grandparents? Would they want to live with you?"
I remember watching a YouTube vid and at the end you get that montage of other videos. I clicked on one, and it opened with a picture of Christine where she had a bigger double chin than me. So these sorts of things stick in this eidetic memory of mine.
I listen to some of his podcasts, though most of the time I only read the text cliffs, but I usually skip all the stuff that is even slightly personal (not my type: religion etc.).
So it could be, and probably is, that you others know almost as a fact that her wife follows devotedly his precepts.
(Even the I think Jimmy's dismissal of her weight gains likely elicited some of the problem. would mostly be something I learn about now.)
But still, thinking of 17 years (or so) and many common women, the use of the word "clearly" etc. nonetheless gave me a bit of a smile.
And it's more than plausible to me that even on the SAD (or single) she would have gained, maybe not 2/3rds, 1/2 of or her weight.
p.s. I have no idea what ED stands for.
ED = eating disorder. I was over mine by the time I married. My hubs' and my weights track mostly together, though this last time I lost my weight about a year before he followed suit (as usual, without trying). For us it IS habits, and it really is difficult to always have to say "no". Life is MUCH better finding workable solutions both can thrive on! For him he gains when he's inactive which occurred a few times when he wasn't working an active job. In fact with his new job it is far less physically demanding and he's going to have to do something to counter that difference or I can predict he'll gain weight (if he hasn't already ... shhh).
Anywho, I'm thinking back to when I was early 20's. I don't think I knew a single woman who weighed under 100 lbs. Of all the reunion pictures from reunions I've missed, and of all the reunions I've attended and such, there are very few with that kind of weight gain, even for those who have had several kids.
I know w/o the ED, I would not have ever gotten obese. A bit "shapely" yeah but not obese or even overweight that someone would have looked at me and thought I was "chunky" or somesuch. If I had one wish it would be to have grown up in the age of J Lo and Beyonce cuz I would have stood a fighting chance on the body image problems and likely never had them at all. I did still go through the ugly duckling phase though, but I think I would have survived that. Google Kristy McNichol and Family and put blonde hair on that girl!
The videos aren't flawless and some of the stuff will make you roll your eyes but they're worth watching all in all.
His use of the term "low carb apologist" makes me laugh for some reason.
Meat tasted very good. Very dark and reach tasting.I saw no fat at all even around kidneys despite the abandon amount of acorns on my two front yard oaks. Diet of my squirrels is excellent - acorns, blueberries, figs, peaches, there are insects whole year round. Bones are like made of carbon fiber.I would gladly eat more, but still not ready to compete with local vultures for a road kill or master my shooting skills. From reading I know turtles supposed to be delicious, I hope some day I will try it too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7svkht_TP0&feature=related
At 7 minutes in, he explains that once Americans get past age 60, only a 'few' die from heart disease or cancer. Yep, according to Layman, most die from falls. Somebody call the AMA, this bitter truth is being hidden from the public in some vast conspiracy. But wait a minute, the AMA is probably the source of the conspiracy... according to modern counter-culture rebels.
Btw, the falls apparently occur because somehow low protein diets make them lose bone mass. The whole talk seems to be some pep rally for a MLM operation to sell "Metaboliq". I couldn't manage to finish listening til the end.
No, Evelyn, I haven't missed the obvious - how do you define cause? My aunt was living an active healthy life, fell, broke her hip, and died within a year of heart failure. This, apparently, is not an uncommon experience. Was heart disease or falling the "cause" of death? Is falling only a cause of death if relatively immediate thereafter, like a major head injury?
If anyone has some good data, I'd really be interested.
That said, falls -> broken bones precipitate and or accelerate other diseases. I watched my own quite active 75 yo mother deteriorate immensely when she was virtually immobilized from a fall -- not down stairs, just a fall -- for about 2 and a half months. I'm happy to report she's back after an arduous year long knee replacement/infection/revision process, but I can only imagine what her life would be if she were not to have gone the TKR route. I honestly don't think she'd be with us today and it would probably be blamed on her heart or natural causes, but yeah, especially heart failure likely brought on by inactivity.
CDC from 2006: http://www.cdc.gov/injury/Images/LC-Charts/10lc%20-%20By%20Age%20Group%202006-7_6_09-a.pdf
In a chart, Figure 5: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db64.pdf
In 2011, cancer becomes #1: https://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/01/health/01brod.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all
"Heart disease is no longer the leading killer of Americans under age 85. Cancer is."
Offhand, I don't see a mechanism how a fall could turn a healthy heart into a failing one in a year. Regarding cancer, there is no way. Yes, there is the notion that a break can often cause a fall, instead of vice versa. But strokes can cause falls, too - along with many other causes.
I didn't come across any figures on falls leading to hospitalization, disability and then death. However, even in those over 80 or so, maybe pneumonia or cancer is number one anyway.
I posted about Layman because he's doing the same thing as almost all the wannabe stars: taking some basis in fact and stretching it beyond all belief... like "only the bun makes you fat".
I'm sure that would also hold in is claim about protein and bone loss.
P.S. The term 'congestive heart failure' has been mostly dropped, since the edema etc is no longer seen as an inevitable feature, in large part because of getting patients to exercise.
"The most common causes of heart failure are coronary heart disease (CHD), high blood pressure, and diabetes" IOW: muscle loss from ischemia, hypertropic cardiomyopathy, and microangiopathy
I think that Layman is preying precisely on the fact that a lot of people do know someone who fell and then went downhill and died. Note that inactivity is not a common cause of heart failure.
He's probably playing on those who know someone ...
Is there data on age of death with onset of diagnosis vs. fall incidence? I doubt it as that would be very difficult to collect.
I understand his leucine/BCAA mechanism and how his 3 equal protein meals per day might work. In particular, he suggests that this protocol might be used by the "older person" to provide a dietary protection against age related sarcopenia. (If you lose it, you can't use it.)
I have, in general, a resistance to "protein shakes", but having examined the composition of Qinava's product, I found it easy to replicate by using raw eggs, cottage cheese and apple in my blender. (Irish milk, y'know, from which KerryGold is sourced.)
I was quite pleased that my 35 gm protein etc. shake resulted in morning long warm hands. I guess that I was experiencing protein digestion thermogenesis.
As regards "elderly falls", my mother, aged 81, who had lost much muscle, had a fall, was hospitalised with a hip break, and died there within 2 days, probably from shock.
Slainte
And sorry to hear about your mother.
Evenepoel et al. Digestibility of Cooked and Raw Egg Protein in Humans as Assessed by Stable Isotope Techniques. J. Nutr. 128 (10): 1716.
Evenepoel et al. Amount and fate of egg protein escaping assimilation in the small intestine of humans. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 277 (5): 935.
Those refs were quite explicit: 50% vs 90%.
I will experiment with microwave just to get whites "white".
Everything is blended anyway - using milk as liquid.
Thank you as regards Mother, however, it was over 20 years ago.
Slainte
No one is likely to make a big splash famewise or to sell their products by merely repeating the tried and true. http://buymetaboliq.com/ has "Burn Packs" selling for $260 - that probably makes even Grok shakes look inexpensive. If you made your own copy of that then I think that's great -- but I still don't believe in magic formulas. Once upon a time a fortune was made by the Met-Rx guy... It never ends.
I have been especially interested as of late in the need to consume protein to replace that which was glycated/oxidized/nitrosated -- as part of fountain-of-youth types of approaches. My personal theory is that exercise 'breaks' those proteins so weakened, and so protein after exercise is ideal.
Also, Muscle Protein Synthesis increases merely from eating protein - but not so much as PWO and I expect that effect wanes.
wrt "I was quite pleased that my 35 gm protein etc. shake resulted in morning long warm hands. I guess that I was experiencing protein digestion thermogenesis." Have you looked into postprandial vasodilation instead?
I've had as many as 10 raw eggs in a morning. They're also very refreshing on a hot day. But usually as a middle-road thing I just lightly cook them. Some go overboard and insist that even stirring eggs too much ruins something.
We usually think of raw foodists as being at the vegetarian end of the spectrum. But there are also raw meat eaters - even those who have 'high' meat. I've tried raw hamburg, raw chicken and raw chicken liver - but a news story of a woman who ended up with a live parasite in her brain made me stop doing that :) ...no matter how unlikely, it's not worth the risk. When I was twenty, I would have been too much of a weenie to even try any of those.
he's also quite the gourmand - being a food lover is a good way to get fat -- except not for Gordon Ramsey or Lydia's son.
-----
Raw egg whites should not be consumed. They contain inhibitors of the digestive enzyme trypsin, which are destroyed by heat. Consuming 100 grams of raw egg white with one egg yolk compared to consuming the same food cooked was shown in one study to reduce protein digestion from 90 percent down to 50 percent.
Raw egg whites also contain an anti-nutrient called avidin. Avidin is a glycoprotein that binds to the B vitamin biotin, preventing its absorption. Biotin is necessary for fatty acid synthesis and the maintenance of blood sugar, and is especially important during pregnancy when biotin status declines.
-----
http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com/Egg_Yolk.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4u-5Tb8WHk&feature=relmfu
Post a Comment
Comment Moderation is ON ... I will NOT be routinely reviewing or publishing comments at this time..