Thoughts on Obesity as "Disease" or Choice ~ Part 1: Smoking & Lung Cancer Analogy

Recently (May 2018) comments about obesity at a Pediatric conference have made the rounds. Specifically: Obesity Is a Disease, Not a Choice, Experts Advise.  Here is link to the full text in  "print version".

The AMA classified Obesity as a disease in 2013. Five years later we've made little to no progress, likely because we've got "experts" pontificating and arguing over semantics and false dichotomies.  The false dichotomy of Disease vs. Choice is right out of whatever master playbook teaches that if you keep the "masses" arguing, they might not notice you're full of it.  It's really the only explanation I can think of for the circular arguments made with nary a tinge of irony on board straight faces.

I have a bunch of stuff in the draft pile here on this topic, but cannot seem to organize it. I decided to start a series.  In no particular order.  

This installment deals with the following statement from the 2013 Resolution by the AMA:

Whereas, Progress in the development of lifestyle modification therapy, pharmacotherapy, and bariatric surgery options has now enabled a more robust medical model for the management of obesity as a chronic disease utilizing data-driven evidenced-based algorithms that optimize the benefit/risk ratio and patient outcomes; and

Whereas, The suggestion that obesity is not a disease but rather a consequence of a chosen lifestyle exemplified by overeating and/or inactivity is equivalent to suggesting that lung cancer is not a disease because it was brought about by individual choice to smoke cigarettes; and

Whereas, The Council on Science and Public Health has prepared a report that provides a thorough examination of the major factors that impact this issue, the Council’s report would  receive much more of the recognition and dissemination it deserves by identifying the enormous humanitarian and economic impact of obesity as requiring the medical care, research and education attention of other major global medical diseases; therefore be it 

Mind over Milkshakes!

This post was prompted by yet another discussion on Facebook involving cravings and hunger and the supposed magic of keto/LC in fixing this aspect.   As the thought process goes:  it's not about calories (even if they count), it's about how the food impacts us that causes us to eat too much (or just enough).   A hat-tip to Melanie (Mac Smiley) who sent me this study almost three years ago! 

TL,DR Summary:  Same people, different days, same shake, different labels.  Hormonal response differed based on expectations.

---

---

Jimmy Moore -- Big Fat Liar -- Steps in it AGAIN! It Was NOT a Joke, He Is!

Blogstress Note:

A quick note to all:  Please share!!

An apology:  Parts are long, and I threw a bunch of images in at the end and such just to preserve for posterity.  Sorry!

An open letter to my critics who may be in the audience:

It's OK for you to think what you may of me.  If you find yourself wanting to blame me, realize this is exactly what Jimmy Moore wants from you so that he can continue perpetrating his fraudulent livelihood.

Jimmy Moore, and now his wife Christine Moore, are not really interested or seeking optimal health.  Jimmy has long given up on weight loss, and it matters not what the actual weight is on the scale at this point, he's behind the ball position on January 1, 2004 (when he began Atkins) in so many ways.  He has a serious eating disorder at the root of all of this ... something he shows no desire to address.  Very sad for him and those who love him. 

Still, he inexplicably preys on desperate obese people seeking solutions or excuses.  He does this to feed an insatiable need for accolades from others, and to live a higher life than he otherwise would be (like multiple cruises each year!).

He makes carbohydrate restriction-based plans -- I don't care what the next fad (and that's what it is!) incarnation is -- look bad.

If keto or LCHF or Atkins or whatever has worked for you, and continues to work for you, go for it!  I'm NOT anti-LC.  But do not spread junk science.  Do not follow and elevate the likes of Jimmy Moore who is FAILING eating that way.   Go forth and share your own story if you want.  Or not.  Probably not a good idea to turn it into your primary source of income.  If you disagree with my assessment of "failing", step back, imagine if he's any fill-in-the-blank spokesperson for some diet you think is bull$#!t and see if you wouldn't agree.    He is the one delegitimizing your successful way of life in the eyes of others.  He is the one adding to all the confusion by spouting nonsense like steak is chocolate cake (true story).

Carbohydrate restriction plans could gain more mainstream traction if its promoters, ESPECIALLY doctors and researchers, stuck to the facts and what the science shows.  It's just that won't make those folks rich, and the accepted science will be nowhere near the exaggerated claims you've heard repeated in your echo chambers. 

Lastly, if you know someone who follows Jimmy or is thinking of following him, share this post with them.  If they still feel he's a reliable source of information, at least you've done your part.  I'd rather you encourage them to chase success.

I don't know what exactly prompted him to try to claim his butter eating stunt was a joke, but that lie don't fly!  In the past with Kimkins and the David Duke KKK scandals, he had to address controversy.  But this must be coming in reaction to "friendly fire" -- criticism from within the community.  I am encouraged by this development!

It was no joke, Jimmy Moore is the joke

That (other) time when Christine Moore watched Jimmy Moore eat an entire stick of Kerrygold at his momma's house

The Cause of the Obesity Epidemic

I couldn't help but snap a picture of this at the playground yesterday.  Asylum regulars will recognize the true cause of the obesity epidemic in this picture. 

Babies In Ketosis

April 2018 Update:

Here in the year 2018, it's fair to say that #Paleo is pretty much over. Nothing tells us this more succinctly than a quick trip over to Mark's Daily Apple, a website I rarely frequent these days. I'd heard rumors that Mark had "gone keto" ... given the seemingly meteoric rise of #Keto of late, is anyone really surprised?  This is the same man who developed the "more addictive than crack" P90X recovery drink and other things, 

Ever the businessman (can't fault him for that), Mark seems to have transitioned from using his blog to sell paleo/primal-related books (did he ever find a proper ghostwriter for his wife's book?) to selling over-priced avocado oil products.   The whole "primal" thing is about as downplayed as possible for someone whose signature product is The Primal Blueprint, can be.    Poor Grok.  Now it's Keto Reset time!  Can these marketeers PLEASE make up their minds?  

When someone doesn't "take" to a so-called keto diet, it's always "they probably weren't fat adapted yet".  This mythical and magical fat-adaptation has been purported to take 6 months to a year to reach full nirvana-level.  But now?  Why you can reboot your metabolism (whatever that means!) in just three weeks, and be a fat burning beast evermore!  Kewl!!

What brought this post update about?  I came across a link to a recent post by Sisson addressing What Happens “After Keto”?

"Google searches for this question have shot up in recent weeks. I’m not surprised. An unprecedented number of people went keto in January purely as a quick weight loss hack, and now they’re looking to transition off of “this weird diet.” ...

Well duh.  The best indicator of the fad-factor of a diet may well be the January bump it receives in Google trends. 

Keto is a reset (a Keto Reset (if you're going to buy this, why not use my affiliate link?), even). It’s a return to the ancestral metabolic state, the metabolic state we were born into (newborns are filthy with ketones, even on their relatively sweet mother’s milk diet). Keto happens really easily in humans compared to other animals. You go 12 hours without eating and then wake up in the morning? You’ll have detectable ketones on your breath. It’s almost like we’re made for it. "endquote

So I tweeted out a tongue in cheek response.  Basically, if you even believe in some sort of rebooting/resetting of your metabolism to its infantile state, why stop with diet and metabolism?  The more one thinks about this, the more absurd the "babies are in ketosis" argument becomes.  Read on.  Don't fall for this!!

As to Mark's contention that "it's like we're almost made for it" ... there's a table at his own link that shows that as a species outside of infancy and pregnancy, compared to rats, we're actually "not so much".   Mark knows this.  Staying in therapeutic ketosis as an adult (not this nutritional gimmick nonsense) is rather difficult for most people.  I've been reminded recently that for some, even a leaf of spinach or the taste of artificial sweeteners can be enough to banish one from planet Keton (coined by @LouSchuler on Twitter).  I won't even quibble (again from conversation on Twitter) with evidence that we aren't "born in ketosis".  

As the recent Gardner-led, partially NuSI funded study demonstrated, modern American humans -- for various reasons -- have difficulty adhering to extreme diets.  This is not evidence against the *potential* for various diets to be effective, nor is it evidence that following such diets is harmful for the long term.  But it is evidence that as a dietary prescription of sorts, neither is going to garner much success in the general population.  But one last thing before I go on this point.  I've mentioned this before, and I'll mention it again.  We have BILLIONS of humans who have thrived on very low fat diets throughout their lives, for generations.  We just don't have anything near this for low carb diets, let alone keto versions.  In his article, Sisson says the following:

Studies as long as five years (link to full text) show no negative side effects of long-term ketogenic dieting, so, provided you do it right (no salami and cream cheese keto diets), I see no reason not to continue.

Look at the full text I provided.  This was a case study on THREE young adults with GLUT-1 deficiency.  Two who were normal weight at baseline lost a little bit of weight in the form of fat.  One who was underweight at baseline gained weight:  this individual grew 1.5 cm indicating she wan't fully grown at baseline, and gained more fat than weight (gained 1.5 kg overall, 2kg fat, thus lost 0.5 kg FFM).  The authors mention that the results here are in contrast to those seen in children treated for epilepsy because of full bone mineralization at baseline.  Perhaps, at the very least, there should be extreme caution for growing children or teens to embark on a keto diet!   I see no reason to trust Mark Sisson on the long-term appropriateness of any diet.  

---

---

Bio-HACK-ing Chronicles Ep.2: Maybe Jimmy Moore Has Hepatic Encephelopathy

No ... this blog will not become all Jimmy Moore, all the time.  I do have some posts in the works that just need some polish ... including one on the study Ted Naiman bases his 3:1 ratios of grams protein to fat that Jimmy was following.  That said, I can't help but put together a few comments on the Drama Llama supreme's latest n=1.

This Episode's n=1 bioHACK:   

• 7 days of "Carnivore" , High Protein (mostly meat)
• 3:1 grams protein:grams fat.   
• 1.5 grams of protein per pound of lean body mass equaled 270 g protein:90 g fat.   (if you use 40% body fat, that puts his current weight at 300 ... )

RESULT:  Fail. 

If you listen at the 43 minute mark of this episode of The Keto Savage podcast, you'll see that it was Jimmy's every intention for this TO fail.

The purpose of biohacking is SUPPOSED to be about seeking out ways to improve one's overall health ... to achieve meaningful goals.  This nonsense of seeing what happens to his glucose and ketone readings here and there, ignore body weight entirely, get two insulin readings, estimate portions, etc. is all just nonsense.   He's not healing anything.  He's playing around with whatever healthy function he has left for social media likes and podcast downloads so he can sell keto stuff to earn affiliate dollars.  Sad really.

Bio-HACK-ing Chronicles Ep.1: What's with Jimmy Moore's HCT & Hb?

I've decided to chronicle some of the biohacking madness going on out there here on the blog.   I'm not sure if this helps anyone, but at least it will preserve some of it for posterity.   So this will randomly include publicly shared results of various "hacks" -- dietary or otherwise.

First up -- who else? LOL -- Jimmy Moore.  Fresh off his second 7-day fast in three weeks, Jimmy continues focusing on all the wrong things instead of actual improvements in things known to improve health.  Apparently low carb is/wasn't enough for Jimmy Moore, so he adopted an extreme version of a keto diet.  This worked swimmingly for a year until he stopped reporting his weight at the end of the year.  He rapidly regained the 80 re-lost pounds and embarked on his first extended fast in the fall of 2015.  That went so well he tried (unsuccessfully) to forego food for the entirety of January 2016, only to balloon up even further.  Forget the scale, I won't even post images, you've seen them all.  He is a profoundly unhealthy man despite cherry-picked biomarkers that appear to indicate otherwise.  

Jimmy Moore is obsessed with measuring ketones (everywhichway, apparently, but up the bum -- is an anal ketone test far behind?  LOL) and blood sugar.  Unless you are using insulin to control diabetes and/or concerned about ketoacidosis, or are on a therapeutic ketogenic diet for something like epilepsy, incessant glucose and (especially) ketone monitoring is pretty meaningless and probably neuroses-inducing in many.   

BOTTOM LINE:  When ANYONE (other than an IDDM) doesn't eat for a few days, their blood sugars will go down and their ketone levels will go up.  So big whoop that this happened to Jimmy Moore.  

I'm rather more interested in this:

Keto will Change Your Life!

Just have to share, this ABSOLUTELY HILARIOUS clip from a recent episode of NCIS Los Angeles (Season 9, Episode 15, around 13 min in). 

Shared on Twitter and Facebook if you want to share on social media!

The Manhattan Project of Nutrition That Wasn't

With publication of the results of the second of the "Original 3" NuSI funded studies, I'm finally getting around to publishing up this post (and perhaps a second one shortly) regarding the Nutrition Science Initiative (NuSI), founded in 2012 by Peter Attia, MD and "science journalist" Gary Taubes. Bottom line ... for NuSI, it was "all over but the crying" a couple of years ago now. 

---

---

Dietary Energy Density and Incidence of Diabetes in the Women's Health Initiative

Summary:

In the Women's Health Initiative, a 2017 analysis of the energy density of baseline diets, stratified to quintiles, revealed several correlative components of an energy dense diet (comparing the top quintile (Q5) to the bottom (Q1).  The energy density, in kcal/gram of food, nearly doubled in Q5 vs. Q1 corresponding to a nearly 50% increase in caloric intake.  The dietary components correlating with this are:

• Fat:  Fat content is by far and away the greatest contributing factor to consuming an energy dense diet.   Absolute intake more than doubled (2.5X) from Q1 to Q5, and comprised roughly 90% of the increased caloric intake.
• Animal Protein:  As protein intake from plant sources remained relatively constant, animal protein intake increased by 40% resulting in an increase in total protein of 25%.  Therefore animal foods are a considerable contributor to increased energy density of the diet.
• Added Sugars:  Added sugar comprised 11% of caloric intake across the quintiles, however absolute added sugar increased almost 50%.  
• Carbohydrate:  Total carbohydrate intake is not associated with increased energy density of the diet.  Increases in added sugars were offset by reduction in other carbohydrates so that absolute intake remained constant.  Thus as a percentage of the caloric intake, carbohydrate declined significantly.
• The macro percent composition of the least energy dense diets was P/F/C of 18/26/59, while the percents were 16/45/41 for the most energy dense diets.

The near doubling of energy density is associated with an (adjusted) roughly 25% increase in the risk of developing diabetes.

---

---