Jimmy Moore ~ Low Carb Asset or Liability?

Another timely bump.  Note that this is almost one year after original publication.  In response mostly to this post, Jimmy wrote:  Who Knew Eating Butter Would Be So Controversial?   Seriously?  There's a difference between eating a pat of butter here and there, and putting a half pound on a plate with some eggs and calling that a meal.  
A few weeks ago, I attended the annual Paleof(x) conference in Austin, Texas and it was such a fantastic experience for everyone in the Paleo, primal, low-carb, real food community. Getting to meet so many people who shared their stories about how the work I am doing is changing their lives is incredibly gratifying and makes me appreciate the unique opportunities that this platform affords me. And while it was a positive experience attending this amazing event, the fact is it was also pretty stressful. It’s happy stress, but stress nonetheless. Plus, as you’ve know I’ve been hunkered down banging out my book on ketogenic diets which entails yet another layer of stress all to its own. Isn’t it ironic that the process of writing a book about health could be so unhealthy? Ahhhh, but I’m not complaining because the end result will be so worth all the effort it took to get there. You’ll see.
With the rise in cortisol as of late, it has taken a toll on my ketones (under 1.0 mmol), blood sugar (hovering around 100), and weight (up ~20 pounds since January). I’m not worried about these things because I recognize what’s going on. Once the editing process of Keto Clarity is finished in the next couple of months, I’ll be able to devote time to recovering and getting all of these numbers back in line again.
Note the bolded play of the Martyr Card.  Cortisol.  Damned that hormone and its magical fat hoarding abilities!   


It's like deja vu, all over again ...






Original Publish Date 4/20/14


Ahh Jimmy Moore.  


Nobody's going to say it, so I might as well start the conversation on the fact that Jimmy's "nutritional ketosis" regime has stopped working for him.   His appearance at PaleoFX New Age CONference and MLM Expo was surely shocking to some.  It shouldn't have been.  This is Jimmy Moore we're talking about and this is nothing new.  More on that in a bit, but first, how about that picture there on the right.  So proud is Jimmy that he made this his profile picture on Twitter and Facebook.  



My own personal ketogenic rehabilitation plan: 5 local pastured eggs cooked in salted Kerrygold grassfed butter with garlic spices and a whole stick of unsalted Kerrygold grassfed butter.

After returning from last week's Paleo(f)x conference travel from South Carolina to Austin, Texas, my ketones and blood sugar have been going wacky on me. So to help get things back in line again, this is a great go-to meal to push ketone levels higher, blood sugar levels lower. If you're ever struggling with ketone production, try this and see how you do.
Jimmy went on to claim that he's so carb sensitive even leafy greens need to be limited.   This will be Gary Taubes' lasting legacy from GCBC for Dummies, aka Why We Get Fat.  If Jimmy replaced half of that block of butter with an equal amount of calories in not only leafy greens but even a potato or two, he'd be far better off.

For anyone not familiar with Kerrygold, that's an 8 ounce block there = 1 cup of butter.  To go with butter to cook 5 eggs in.  I'm not going to bother with the fancy nutritional break down here, but this meal is roughly 35 grams of protein and a whopping 180g fat.  In one sitting.   This is NOT healthy.  For anyone.  NOBODY in the history of mankind has ever considered a block of butter a meal.  This is beyond insane.  AND HE IS ENCOURAGING OTHERS TO FOLLOW HIS LEAD.

Later in the same day as posting this, Jimmy had this exchange on Twitter:


Yes folks, butter is gathered!   This would be humorous if it weren't so sad and so many still follow this guy's lead.   I don't know what Victory Belt is thinking giving this guy a second book deal, but that he is any sort of leader or mouthpiece for the low carb and paleo communities is a joke.  Worse than Fat Head comedy routine fare at that.

I got in trouble for "persecuting" members of the low carb community when I began calling them out with my Is LC morphing into HAES series.   I stand by that series, and no, no matter how much know-nothings repeat misrepresentations of what I say, I was not mocking ANYONE for their weight. 

Read any LC diet book, beginning with Atkins, and there is the same promise of effortless weight loss consuming tons of food.  It's the insulin stupid!  But these gurus all ran into the same problem everyone else has:  weight is difficult to lose when you have a lot of it to lose, and if you succeed at losing it, it is even more difficult to maintain.  I get that.  I've lived that.  But the low carb community on the whole are poor ambassadors for their "way of eating".  This is when weight loss morphed into "I'm doing this for my health" and *healthy* got attached to low carb all over the place.  
Q:  Why do you care about Jimmy's weight you middle aged woman, you?  (paraphrased from marksuave recent comments here).
A:  I don't.  I care about others who might follow his lead.  I care about their health and that they are making the best choices for themselves based on the facts as we know them, not as folks like Jimmy twist them.
When you read, look, listen and learn from the LC gurus, the health picture is pretty dismal indeed.  Jimmy has been using phrases such as "I'm doing keto for my health not weight loss" since last Fall.  Translation:  "I'm gaining weight again".  In 2012, weighing close to 300 lbs, Jimmy told Abel James he was the healthiest he's ever been.  A year later, as he dipped below the 250 pound mark, readers were treated to a litany of health problems he was suffering that ketosis had resolved.   

Lately he's taken to using the word *thriving* to describe his life on beta hydroxybutyrate.  

Why when I read that does the image of this guy keep popping into my head?

Now I am sorry to point this out, but in most studies involving weight loss on a reasonable low carb diet, metabolic markers do tend to improve.  Not all of them, however, and that cannot be ignored.  But Jimmy Moore may well be the first person to ever lose 80 lbs and see his LDL go up 80 points (or more).   His fasting blood sugars had been creeping into pre-diabetic range for years prior, he required berberine to bring them down.  (This, by the way on the backdrop of an ex low carber and a current one admitting to prediabetic and frank diabetic FBG levels recently).  

And yet ... There he was at PaleoFX last weekend moderating two panels.  One on how to piss off your mainstream doctor and waste thousands of dollars on functional medicine, and the other to clear up the cholesterol confusion only he seems to have.  (Pay no attention to that MLM banner ... run away!!)











Jimmy has taken to loaning out his soapbox -- aka the Livin la Vida Low Carb Show -- to all manner of chiropractors and "nutritionists" practicing medicine without a license on the internet.  This is his "relevance" at this point.  The low carb community gets mad -- boy do they ever -- when anyone points out the circus side show nature of it all.   "That's just Jimmy" pretty much doesn't cut it any more.  That's a dangerous man is what he is. 

So yesterday it was brought to my attention that one of my biggest fans, goes by the name of Eddie, is turning a bit on his friend.  It seems Eddie is not happy with Jimmy's butter stunt.  It makes a mockery of low carb.  Eddie doesn't like me too much because I expose the underbelly of his beloved community.  I also blog on the science here as regards what type 2 diabetes really is.  In his world view, there is only one way to go with that -- VLC and metformin.  It's a myopic view shared by many in the low carb community and they must prevent people from being exposed to folks like me who might show you otherwise through credible scientific references.   But anyway ...

He is upset with this stunt.  Hellooooooo?!!  Where have you been?  

  • 2007:  Jimmy gets to 248, goes on Kimkins, loses 35 or so pounds.  Generates a lot of publicity, rakes in a lot of money.  
  • 2010:  Jimmy gets to 280, goes on an eggfast -- nothing but eggs and coconut oil and butter for a month.  He reported a partial cholesterol profile at that time.  Not good.
  • 2011:  Jimmy gets to 290, goes on a beef, egg and CO "challenge" that quickly morphs to a BECO + chocolate diet.  
  • 2011:  After falling off that diet he fasts for 6 days and reaches his pre-KK weight of 248.  This sets him up to regain and he is up to 285 by year's end
  • 2012:  Jimmy tops 300 lbs and goes on "nutritional ketosis" experiment for one year.
See a pattern yet Eddie?  These are just the major extreme weight loss stunts.  Each time he has profited through affiliate sales and such as everyone marvels at the great weight loss magic.  I remember your comments on the stalker blog about how he would "show me" ... ummm ... show me what?  That he can lose weight?  He has shown the world that many times over.  He did it once with a low fat diet in 1999 losing 170 lbs then.  The only person Jimmy is impressing these days is the naive newbie or those who hope his shirt tails are long enough to garner them publicity and a chance at the internet prize$.

Have you seen this video? { EDIT 4/20 Awww, he removed the video.  No doubt because it shows him not only eating butter in a manner no normal person would, but because he did that while promoting Julian Bakery bread.  Julian Bakery now makes paleo breads and has co-re-branded as Paleo Inc.  Still very bad man and bakery to Jimmy Moore who hates that Paleo Magazine runs rull back-cover ads for Paleo bread and the like.  Oh oops!  Jimmy runs ads for Paleo Mag ... Awkward! }


Skip to around the 5 minute mark where he makes a "pizza" with *only* half a stick of butter on it.  2009 Eddie, 2009.  Jimmy has been struggling against self-made metabolic demons.  If his metabolism is broken, he did that, and it wasn't even the Little Debbies and Coke from his first 32 years to blame.  Perhaps you missed all the times -- when he allowed comments and discussions on his menus blog -- so many well meaning folks, myself included, encouraged him to moderate his approach, stabilize his weight, stop the "up the fat" and calorie denial that was sabotaging his efforts.  He didn't want any of it.  But you keep on calling me an awful human being when I call charlatans out on their games and do my best to present the full picture.  Remember, I came to this wanting to find reassurances about LC.  You can believe what you want from what others say, but that is the truth.

Good to have you on board calling out the damage he does to what remains of the legitimacy of low carb diets for diabetes and weight loss.  There is some.  It is not a silver bullet though, and there are options for some that LC dogma simply will not accept.  Why do you want to limit the information on which people make their health choices?   Rhetorical question.



EDIT #2 4/20:

I forgot to add something that came to my attention recently as well.  People who just come across Jimmy's sites, or catch him as a guest on a podcast, see him at an annual CONference, etc., generally have no idea what's really going on.  It is OK to struggle with weight.  It is not OK to be dishonest about it while personally vouching for products and services and profiting off of them.  In the past almost two years Jimmy has encouraged non-diabetic people to waste money on diabetic supplies and it showed in his yearly review of Amazon sales.  Even this tweet is about "rehabilitation" for his ketone levels, no mention that this has not been working for some time for his weight maintenance.  Even if he were 230, it would appear that those 230 lbs are increasingly "bad" -- as in less lean, more fat, and more concentrated abdominal obesity, a situation we can all agree (I hope) is associated with being less rather than more healthy.   But in articles and elsewhere, his ORIGINAL now almost 10 year old weight loss before/afters are still used.

Articles such as this one:  Ketogenic diet expert Jimmy Moore credits low-carb diet for 180-lb weight loss.  Granted it's an examiner.com article, but ...
... Moore, 42, said eating more fat not only helped him lose weight, but boosted his energy, eliminated nagging carb cravings, and improved his cholesterol profile. "Saturated fat actually raises your good cholesterol the best of all the foods you can eat," said Moore, who detailed his research in his books, Cholesterol Clarity and 21 Life Lessons From Livin' La Vida Low-Carb. ....
... Jimmy is a leader in the growing LCHF movement, which has been buoyed by recent medical reports touting the many health benefits of unprocessed saturated fat. Moore discusses the LCHF diet on his widely read blog, Livin' La Vida Low-Carb, and his popular weekly podcast.
Moore joins a long list of health and medical experts who agree that unprocessed saturated fat does not cause obesity, diabetes, or heart disease. ....
Expert?  Research?
'I Am Never Hungry'
Moore has had no trouble maintaining his 180-pound weight loss, and said he typically consumes about 20 grams of carbs a day. That may sound restrictive to some, but Moore insists his high-fat diet — which typically consists of eggs, avocados, bacon, sour cream, and full-fat cheese — satisfies him completely.
"Sometimes I actually forget to eat," he said. "It's freeing to not be burdened with the need to eat every three to four hours, like most people do."



Comments

rudyInLA said…
I just googled gomad. WHAT?!?! A gallon of milk a day?!? Really? No, that's normal. Good plan dude! Holy COW!
rudyInLA said…
Get ready for Farm Stories!!!!!!! Jeeezzzz.......
charles grashow said…
Look at his website - that's not the only crazy diet he's tried
EatLessMoveMoore said…
So what happened with AHS13, Evie? Just remember, for the past two years or so I've been working tirelessly on YOUR behalf (and been quite successful, I might add) - but I could very easily change sides. Food for thought.
EatLessMoveMoore said…
Good for you, fucktard.
Screennamerequired said…
God I always cringe watching those types of video's. Durianrider does the same thing. Filming his girlfriend like she's some science specimen, prodding and probing with ridiculous questions that will help his youtube views.
Tolovana said…
Most of it is totally awful. There's a Bob's Red Mill "hearty whole grain" GF mix that's 100 times better than any of the frozen stuff that's out there. But, it's just like making real home-made bread, yeast and all, except you don't knead it. Takes time most people won't bother with, and it spoils faster than commercial bread, of course. There's a local company that makes a respectable Challah, too. A little dense, but delicious.7-8 dollars a loaf gets you decent GF bread. But these are not paleo or low-carb, at all.
rudyInLA said…
Aside from sounding insane, they look awful. They can't figure out that it's not eating bananas that keeps them emancipated, it's riding bikes and running ALL DAY! Just crazy. All my opinion of course. She looks worse than he does and that's pretty bad indeed!
rudyInLA said…
Going way off script here but back to the original paragraph of this subject, has everyone clicked his pic Evelyn posted? I did and that led me to look at his Twitter feed. It's priceless. Is that a joke? It has to be! No seriously. Cupcakes, Dream Fields Pasta lawsuit updates, seemingly missing Peeps candy.....and the pics of the other actors in this Paleo drama. Real action photos I can only compare to prize winning war photography, only awful and saying nothing. He has to be delusional......he HAS to be!
Lighthouse Keeper said…
The paleo paradox continues unabated, paleo cupcakes , paleo farms, wearing specially tinted glasses so you can stay up late looking at your paleo i-pad.
rudyInLA said…
Well I have a confession that will probably elicit snickers and ridicule but I wear thos glasses too! Gunnar's. I've been wearing them for years and had some from another manufacturer years ago. I was in the special effects business and often spent 10 to 15 hours a day staring at monitors. They actually reduce my eye strain. Go ahead, laugh your heads off. ia can take it. It does upset to be lumped in with the Paleo Psychosis. Can I just claim they work for me? They used to wear similiar glasses in LeMans Auto Racing, 24 hours long. Serengeti used to make them too.
charles grashow said…
Bacon Jam



http://www.marksdailyapple.com/bacon-jam/#axzz302VO3fzi
Lighthouse Keeper said…
They wear them to simulate fading light levels rather than for eye strain, by filtering out certain frequencies of the light spectrum it simulates nocturnal cave dwelling conditions of yore - at least on some neurological level, they then build on this authenticity by staying up past their paleolithic bedtime tweeting about their latest trip to the local farm in their SUV to pick up their half side of cow.
rudyInLA said…
OK assuming you're not kidding I feel better. That HAS to be a joke! I'm positive no such time machine effects are not claimed for my glasses. Paleo may be in the next DSM or whatever that book of mental abnormalities is called.
Lighthouse Keeper said…
No kidding Rudy, google 'paleo amber tinted glasses'
rudyInLA said…
OMG! Dr Oz was pushing these on his show years ago! He didn't refer to Paleo or Ancestral nonsense. There is some basis for them in fact regarding melatonin but to tie them to any FOOD IDEALOGY IS JUST PLAIN DOG STUPID OR DISHONEST! We used them in the effects business years ago on long shooting days with Blue Screen sets. After 2 to 20 hours on a brightly lit set with 50x100' walls of blue, you lost your color vision for hours afterwards. Even driving home could become a problem. Oh well.....I shouldn't be surprised I guess. A buck's a buck and a sucker's a sucker. Thanks for the info!
carbsane said…
I have a post 3/4 done on low-carb-food-gate, but am just busy with other things. Hilariously his current sponsors include a bread company that goes by Wheat Belly edicts and another bread company that lists wheat gluten as its first ingredient on one product. Just show me the money!!!
rudyInLA said…
THAT I'm looking forward to! If I create a list of things not to eat that targets stuff that most people OVER eat, they lose weight! Real rocket science. "Dear JM.....I used to eat a pint of ice cream and a pizza every night. I followed your Ketone/Low/Carb/Egg Only/Fast/Pound of Butter for Breakfast diet and am NEVER hungry! Not only do I no longer feel like eating......I wish I were dead! Thank you JM!!!!! You're my idol!"
Lighthouse Keeper said…
Yes biohacking is an interesting sideline attached to paleo but it often sails a little too close to pseudoscience so it should be approached with skepticism or you could find yourself sitting in an ice filled bath tub wearing amber goggles drinking olive oil with a peg on your nose and magic piezoelectric bands on your wrists whilst your i-pod fills your brain with primordial rhythms.
Some of these things might actually work but they can become cultish when meshed with ideology.
rudyInLA said…
Hey I just went to the fathead website. It's been hacked and hijacked! Really! It Says hacked by White Shadow with a Soviet Flag! Evelyn........what have you been up to! OK....just kidding on that last statement but it HAS been hijacked. Funky! that's not cool.

http://www.fathead-movie.com
Wuchtamsel said…
That sounds awesome.
Sanjeev Sharma said…
I've been promoting redshift (the Linux native alternative to f.lux) and knowledge of melanopsin & the Suprachiasmatic nucleus for a while.

Stephan's partner Dan is making part of his career the spreading of this knowledge.
EatLessMoveMoore said…
When did I ever claim to be you, Evie? Last time I checked you didn't own the concepts of carbs and sanity. All I ever did was disseminate your ideas in diverse places - move the ball a little further down the court, as it were. I will always give you credit for blowing the lid off the Jimmy Moore webpire. That - along with debunking Gary Taube$ - will be your supreme achievement, in my estimation. But....censor me just like Jimbo would if you must. Your loss - and the larger struggle's loss as well.
Hello_I_Love_You said…
Seth Roberts just passed away. He had some ingenious ideas about set points and food reward. But he also used to consume a half a stick of butter (66g) every day, claiming it improved cognitive functioning. His another trademark was mega-dosing Omega 3 via flaxseed oil (60 g/day of ground flaxseed when he's in China).

In February 2009, he got a heart scan and scored 38 (50th %ile); in August 2010, he took another scan and got 29 (25-50th %ile). He attributed the 24% decrease to the half stick of butter and more animal fat he introduced to his diet. Why, even Paul Jaminet chimed in and congratulated him on the reduction and lauded the apparent anti-atherogenic effect of butter:

http://perfecthealthdiet.com/2011/04/how-to-raise-hdl/

That was less than 4 years ago. What do you think really happened? Can I give you a hint? Seth never disclosed his cholesterol numbers but did admit that his HDL was "low":

http://blog.sethroberts.net/2009/08/13/heartscan/

For his age group, Seth was probably saturating himself with fat, excuse the pun. With low HDL and a middling CAC score, he probably had not insignificant atherosclerosis and some other risk factors, such as high BP and inflammation. But while he was a biohacker when it came to food, he didn't really like getting lab results; his 2 heart scans he only grabbed at because they were (or 1 was) offered free.


Maybe Jimmy will now come to his senses and ditch the butter stunt. Seriously, 3 low-carb or fat-friendly health gurus pass away in a fairly short period all from apparent CVD. Seth is estimated by many to have been in his early 60s. But moderation is key. There is no advantage for a low-carb or an extreme diet that promotes mindless fat orgies. Do you think Paleo will learn from this?


Hardly. Excuses are already coming down the pike.
charles grashow said…
Set Roberts was 61-62 years old when he passed away.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/11/magazine/11FREAK.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Does the Truth Lie Within?
By STEPHEN J. DUBNER and STEVEN D. LEVITT
Published: September 11, 2005

The Accidental Diet
Wuchtamsel said…
Uh, I would say "collapse" is a pretty euphemistic description for a heart attack...

"Maybe Jimmy will now come to his senses and ditch the butter stunt."

Mmmm, well... I know that you know he won't! ^^ I'd rather guess that Jimmy will explain Robert's death with his excessive consumption of spinach. A clear case of undiagnosed carb sensitivity...

"Seriously, 3 low-carb or fat-friendly health gurus pass away in a fairly short period all from apparent CVD."



May I ask who the other two were? I didn't follow the subject so thorougly the last months.
I believe that the other two are Barry Groves of Second Opinions and Dr. Robert K. Su of Carbohydrates Can Kill.
charles grashow said…
http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/who-knew-eating-butter-would-be-so-controversial/22585

"Fat is where it’s at and I’ll proudly continue to eat this way as long as my body is benefiting from it. If you don’t want to eat that way, that’s cool. But don’t bemoan me for eating in such a way that works for me. And for Jimmy Moore that’s a very low-carb, moderate protein, very high-fat, ketogenic diet."


The man is DELUSIONAL!
Wuchtamsel said…
Thanks alot. I must admit I have never heared of anyone of them. But I guess I couldn't care less. (Not to have heared of them! Death is a tragedy in any way, even and may be even more so if self inflicted.)
rudyInLA said…
OK I admit it.....I read a Fat Head Blog today, well.....snippets of it......and listened with an ear to LLLC JM's podcast while I was assembling some drawers this morning. I'm safe admitting this because I am currently just observing the hypocrisy diet (Paleo) going around these days. So Evelyn and many of you here were right, but I had no idea how right you are. Today, the Fat Head Blog ( The comments are priceless ) and this podcast coincidentally are both about Resistant Starch, heaven forbid they use the words, carbs or food or just plain old starch, and it's benefits are touted here, but VERY CAREFULLY dealt with to make it clear that it's not just starch but MAGICAL STARCH that's almost meat in some cases. Not kidding. So when I eat a bit of sweet potato which I do almost 7 days a week because I like it and it makes me feel good and happy.......well that's not the same as an RS sweet potato! Well.....it is but it's not you know what I mean? You don't? Oh...well basically it's different because you aren't eating it correctly....I think...or something like that. So check it out yourself, or don't, but let me just say basically the last line of the Fat Head blog is advising you to eat a POTATO even though it must be smothered in butter. OK....thanks for the 100+ year old advice. My mom knew this and she couldn't read....literally. I'll skip the smothered part about the butter. Maybe a touch of butter. final comedic mention is on the podcast where they tell you the problems with the magical MCT oil and how they now have a SPECIAL blended oil....uh oh....sounds like chemistry, oil you can buy at a SPECIAL website. Just shoot me!
charles grashow said…
http://www.primalbody-primalmind.com/question-about-butter/

"Q: Hi Nora–How much butter is too much butter? We eat mostly Kerrygold or raw butter but my friend was concerned that we were eating way too much. Would love your thoughts. Thanks!
~Susie"
rudyInLA said…
I don't believe JM eats a stick of butter at a time, or even a week and I don't think he avoids carbs, and I think his exercise "plan" is imaginary at best. All speculation and my opinion of course. If all of that stuff he claims to do does for me what it appears to have done for him...NO THANKS! I think all these guys still have this burning ember of fear and doubt about the "clarity" regarding cholesterol. Don't kid yourself.
Wuchtamsel said…
I'd tend to believe that, too... But given the cholesterol test results he makes public I absolutely think it's possible he could be "honest" this far.
rudyInLA said…
Maybe personally but publicly I expect him to double down. He's got a book coming out you know.
Wuchtamsel said…
Sure, I'm more worried that some gullible people could actually do whatever comes even close to that.
It's a shame you apparantly can't sue a "diet guru" in the US. I mean, damn, these guys are causing damage...
rudyInLA said…
Your concern is well placed. A lot of people follow these ideas and as is the American Way, do MORE than these guys as in if some is good more is better. I seem to remember some radio host or blog guru in North Carolina or thereabouts being charged by the State'h Attorney for dispensing medical and nutrition advice with no credentials. People don't like supplements and diet controls which I never understood. Some of that stuff is literally poison.
charles grashow said…
http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/who-knew-eating-butter-would-be-so-controversial/22585

"With the rise in cortisol as of late, it has taken a toll on my ketones (under 1.0 mmol), blood sugar (hovering around 100), and weight (up ~20 pounds since January). I’m not worried about these things because I recognize what’s going on. Once the editing process of Keto Clarity is finished in the next couple of months, I’ll be able to devote time to recovering and getting all of these numbers back in line again."


The man has been UNABLE to control/stabilize his weight since 1999!!
He's DELUSIONAL!!
How can Dr Westman continue to be associated with him is beyond comprehension!
rudyInLA said…
Thanks for that Facebook link. That's priceless! His eulogy to the guy turns into a Low Carb commercial and a pitch for JM media stuff. And he flips out if you even MENTION his brother. What an ass!
Wuchtamsel said…
Gaining 20 pounds in less than 4 months while hovering around prediabetic BG and no worry... Keto advantage... It's really priceless.
Kitty said…
You can't say your diet is sustainable and not extreme if you can't even hold a job and follow it at the same time. He's basically saying that he will continue to gain for the next couple months because he can't work and follow a nutty K diet at the same time. It's understandable, I guess, if your diet requires hours of blood testing and tracking every day, but he does have all that time that he doesn't "waste" exercising.


Is he still calling LCHF easy and sustainable with a straight face?
charles grashow said…
http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/who-knew-eating-butter-would-be-so-controversial/22585

Jayson Doglet

an hour ago

Sorry, but you've gained 20 lbs since January and want to blame it on stress. Come on. You're eating too much, or not working out enough. You've done the egg fast, and the sticks-of-butter diet ... don't you realize that you're suggesting that desperate people do stupid things? I would like to see you take a break, get your dietary sh*t together, and
get healthy before you tell other people what to do. As long as you're way overweight, you lack credibility. No thanks. No sticks of butter for moi.

Reply
Mod

Jayson Doglet
an hour ago

I appreciate your perspective and comments about this, Jayson. However, I don't these we've ever met in person or know each other in real life. So I can't see how you can make such declarative statements like I'm "eating too much" or "not working out enough." That's just simpleminded thinking that serves no good purpose in an intelligent discussion.

Your points would be valid if you were a friend or family member witnessing what is happening to me. But you are neither. I'm not sure what "stupid things" you think I am suggesting to anyone. I'm merely pointing out that eating butter is not the grand evil that so many people are making it out to be. That's all.

I'm doing very well in my health right now buddy thanks to that intake of high-quality
butter and other real, whole foods. There's nothing to get "together" about what I am doing. Walk a mile in my shoes as a former 400-pounder with metabolic issues galore and then we'll talk. Until then, your criticisms pretty much fall flat on their face as self agrandizing, arrogant, and ignorant.

THANKS again for your comments!




The man is living in the land of DENIAL!!
Kitty said…
He doesn't seem to get that no one cares what he eats; we care what he's telling everyone to eat and lying that it works for him. "Obese Man Eats Tons of Butter" is hardly a headline. A fat guy eating a stick of butter isn't shocking, it's just gross. He hasn't wrapped his head around the fact that all those "idiots" he makes fun of for ordering skim milk lattes are thinner and healthier than he is.


I expect Jimmy will have a heart attack at some point. I wonder if he will go into hiding or admit to everyone he was wrong if he survives it. Who am I kidding? He'll blame it on the vegetables he eats once a month.
charles grashow said…
http://www.archevore.com/panu-weblog/2011/9/29/jimmy-moore-inquires-about-safe-starches.html

"But a long term VLC ketogenic diet is not a good idea. It does not mimic the ancestral diet in general, even if some populations have tolerated it when they had to. There is no need for most people to do it to lose fat, as food reward effects are more powerful. I would advocate long term ketosis in those with neurodegenerative brains diseases like Alzheimer dementia and Parkinson disease, and a 10 day water fast followed by long term ketogenic diet is worth trying if you have cancer.

But I would not recommend VLC ketosis as a long term way of life the way I would not recommend running a half marathon every day, or lifting weights to failure on a daily basis, or taking chemotherapy drugs when you don't have cancer. Ketosis probably stresses the body and works via hormesis. But the clean up and repair response cannot happen if there is no rest from it.

I personally eat around 30% carbohydrate now and have not gained an ounce from when I ate 10-15% (and I have eaten as high as 40% for over a year also with zero fat gain) If anything I think even wider ranges of carbohydrate intake are healthy.

One can probably eat well over 50% of calories from starchy plant organs as long as the animal foods you eat are of high quality and micronutrient content."
Wuchtamsel said…
I bet all my possessings he would claim it on allegedly(!) following the food guide pyramid for so many years before he found the holy grail of VLCHF...
charles grashow said…
JM's BG was being held in check by his use of berberine.

BUT - why would some one on a VLCHF diet need Berberine?

ALSO - Berberine lowers cholesterol an a different pathway than statins SO his recent rise in TC to 392 was a direct result of his stopping Berberine.

This man is CLUELESS!!
Wuchtamsel said…
Mmmh, always when I think it can't get worse with regards to that guy I have to learn I'm wrong...
WTF is he thinking? Is he thinking? Are his readers thinking? Looking at some other weird "views" I think we see some kind of new phenomenon in certain parts of the US society. "Denial-everything" or maybe "Peak-denial". Climatechange, detremental effects of free access to guns for everyone and his mother, evolution, obvious dangers of extreme VHFLC-diets, it's all just a conspiracy of the establishment I guess.
charles grashow said…
I'm calling BS on the whole thing. This man has been unable to maintain his weight since 1999! Just more excuses.

1999 - Lost 180 lbs on a portion controlled low fat diet - gained it all back in 4 months.

2004 - Lost 180 lbs doing the Atkins diet - went up and down for the next 8 years until he peaked at 307 lbs in 2012.

Started his stupid N=1 ketogenic diet - went down to 230 lbs and now he's back up to at least 250 lbs (my guess is he weighs much more - probably closer to 270).

SO - what does he do now? He's down to 3% carbohydrate - does he go full-blown zero carb diet?

What he CAN'T do is add back safe starches like his good friend Tom "Fat Head" Tom Naughton is now doing because that would mean his ENTIRE paradigm is wrong.
carbsane said…
It's worse than that. There are pictures of him from January sitting right next to Westman at a book signing where he had clearly regained at least 10 lbs from his "goal" ... looked to be more like 20, but I'm not about to look more than I need to ;-).


So he has likely regained close to or even half of the most recent 2012-2013 loss in the past year. This is reminiscent of back in 2010-11 when he would describe his weight regain of 50 lbs as "measley" on his menus blog.





I am sympathetic to the struggle. I am not sym
charles grashow said…
I am neither sympathetic to the struggle or to the man. He doesn't deserve any sympathy from anyone because of the lies he tells repeatedly.
charles grashow said…
http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/who-knew-eating-butter-would-be-so-controversial/22585

As Jimmy says - "Yes, I have complete control of hunger and have to be reminded by my
wife Christine to eat sometimes. I don't necessarily eat more, but I can attest to some weight gain due to the stress I already explained. Blood sugar is lower and blood ketones are higher in a non-stress situation. And the ketogenic diet free from cortisol abnormalities get me there."


SO - he doesn't necessarily eat more BUT the 20+ pounds he's gained are due to stress that affected his blood sugar, blood ketones and his cortisol levels!!
Hello_I_Love_You said…
Exactly what Kurt would say. Food reward is more powerful than carb restriction.


- Restrict food reward items
- Increase carbs to above ketosis or VLC levels


Most people will not regain weight. What you thought was achieved through carb restriction was actually done through negating food reward. But if you're a good vs. evil person, and cannot grasp shades of grey, carbs will always be bad. And sugar is worse, while fructose is downright evil.


But the world is a thousand shades of grey and confusing. The easy mantra is just to assume: carbs are evil.
Wuchtamsel said…
Yeah, metabolic issues... JM would even gain weight in a concentration camp, because of the high carb diet of bread and watersoup. Not to talk about the high stress level. That's what he believes I guess.
Pinky Artichoke said…
I've come here a couple of times over the last few days wanting to comment but having trouble with the "if you don't have anything nice to say don't say anything at all" lesson from childhood. If Jimmy was just some guy at work I'd feel bad for him, he really does not look well and it certainly sounds like he has an eating disorder. It's really disgusting to me, though, that he keeps writing books and acting as some sort of thought leader. How can he look himself in the eye?
carbsane said…
He has a home, a beach house and a separate condo just for writing his books there!
Wuchtamsel said…
And no health insurance? Oh my...
Really???
Rosie May said…
Perhaps he's secretly getting commission from Kerrygold as well.
Kitty said…
It's no longer dieting. It's sorcery at this point.


Is he unaware that ketogenic diets cause cortisol levels to go up?
charles grashow said…
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1199154

Althoughthe very low-carbohydrate diet produced the greatest improvements in most metabolic syndrome components examined herein, we identified 2 potentially deleterious effects of this diet. Twenty-four hour urinary cortisol excretion, a hormonal measure of stress, was highest with the very low-carbohydrate diet. Consistent with this finding, Stimson et al reported increased whole-body regeneration of cortisol by 11β-HSD1 and reduced inactivation of cortisol by 5α- and 5β-reductases over 4 weeks on a very low- vs moderate-carbohydrate diet. Higher cortisol levels maypromote adiposity, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular disease, as observed in epidemiological studies. In a 6-year prospective, population-based study of older adults in Italy, individuals in the highest vs lowest tertile of 24-hour cortisol excretion, with or without preexisting cardiovascular disease, had a 5-fold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. C-reactive protein also tended to be higher with the very low-carbohydrate diet in our study, consistent with the findings of Rankin and Turpyn. Other studies also have found reductions in measures of chronic inflammation, including CRP with a low–glycemic index diet.

And the rebuttal
http://www.ketotic.org/2014/02/the-ketogenic-diets-effect-on-cortisol.html
Sue Staltari said…
Did you ever hear what Barry Groves actually died of? Do you think that Atkins simply slipped or his diet played a part - he also had heart damage I believe from a virus??
Can't say, but those I think are the gurus the previous poster's enquiring about regarding the original quote. Know of any other low carb promoters who've died recently? Perhaps you should redirect to the original poster.
No, but these are the low carb gurus who have passed away recently until and unless there are others. I think your question would be better directed at the original quote for which I was providing the answer above.

Speaking of viruses and immune function, there is considerable discussion about metabolic issues and states playing a role in depressing immune function and triggering a hormonally triggered inflammatory state.
carbsane said…
I can see that for the "old guard" .. it's the post 2011-ish newbies that are the worst!
carbsane said…
Doubt anyone will ever know for sure.
charles grashow said…
This is why this man is dangerous

https://www.facebook.com/LLVLC/photos/a.213965122064796.47381.191018811026094/484608215000484/?type=1&stream_ref=10
LWC said…
I realize I'm late to this conversation, but "I would say "collapse" is a pretty euphemistic description for a heart attack..." is exactly how I took it as well. That he either had a massive heart attack or a cerebral hemorrhage (stroke).


I'm not a doctor though. I suppose there are other afflictions that could make someone die suddenly.
carbsane said…
Where are all these people? Do you really think that if these chronic diseases were really cured, the rich would certainly never suffer again?
Simas said…
Well I'm not talking about heart disease or cancer, etc. I'm talking about skin issues, thyroid issues, chronic fatigue syndrome, low energy levels, migraines, insomnia, list is endless. And some of them are really capable of dealing with these conditions, although it's that there are lots of sharlatans who order a bunch of expensive tests and think they're doing something good. Just like the other fields, including conventional medicine, there are people who don't have an idea of what they're doing, the same is with functional medicine. It's just that there's probably more people in this field because it's not established and there's not enough regulations. I hope that will change.
Simas said…
So it seems we're on the same page here. Yea, that Paleologix thing looked really suspicious the first time I saw it, and I get what you're saying, because I really think along the same lines. There's really so much BS around that it's just impossible for the average people to find the real deal... Even some MDs are jumping on LCHF craze... Anyway, I see where you're coming from. Nice blog, keep it up!
Simas said…
I'm not sure, but I have seen Amy's presentation on Paleo fx and I got the idea that she was so good at lying that she tricked everybody, including Myers, into thinking that everything's allright eating wise. That's pretty convincing to me, but who knows.
carbsane said…
This is my point about "functional medicine". ANY Doctor should have known there was an ED involved. If not for the obvious, then b/c one gets a medical history. Amy herself mentioned wasting a ton of money on Amy Myers' care. I'd rather not discuss the PFX talks at this time. I'm just happy that Amy has found qualified help, though even there some of the comments her therapist made publicly at PFX were cringe-worthy.
Nigel Kinbrum said…
Chemical Engineers, too. https://twitter.com/FatEmperor/status/502220051127500800 :-/ I just blocked him.
carbsane said…
It pains me to see a chem eng on this bandwagon.
Nigel Kinbrum said…
Me, too. Another one gone down the rabbit-hole.
Sanjeev Sharma said…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_medicine

http://www.change.org/p/jimmy-wales-founder-of-wikipedia-create-and-enforce-new-policies-that-allow-for-true-scientific-discourse-about-holistic-approaches-to-healing/responses/11054
Evan said…
Not even hospitals are safe from his propaganda!

http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/the-llvlc-show-episode-886-jimmy-moores-july-2014-lecture-at-ius-health-arnett-hospital/23791
Shannon Dean said…
I'm a LCer. But I'm not a stick 'o butter eating LCer. I do enjoy coconut oil in my coffee. It tastes really good and makes me feel awesome. I also love that I can eat a big ole ribeye without trimming the fat, because it tastes so damn good! I also eat way more veggies now than I ever have. I enjoy 'forbidden' foods once every couple of weeks or so, without freaking out about it. I don't go crazy, but in may have french fries along with my unless burger, and will enjoy a small slice of birthday cake when at a friend's celebration. I would say I do moderate fat. I do find it annoying when it becomes a competition to see how much fat one can eat in the LCHF circles. I can't understand freaking out about 1g of carbs in a sauce, for instance. I have mixed feelings about Jimmy Moore, as I read CC and tried eating this way as a last-ditch effort before being put on statins. I don't think he's an honest man and frankly, just don't like him from what I've seen. My LDL-P was 2185, and after 3 months was down to 1800. They didn't test this number at my 6 month interval because it wasn't covered by insurance (and didn't ask me or I would've paid), but I'll have it checked again in April at the one year mark. My other numbers weren't so bad to begin with but they have improved quite a bit after 6 months of eating this way. LDL from 156 to 130, HDL from 35 to 55, and TG from 126 to 86, IR score from 62 to 52. My BP went from borderline high to currently 106/70. I think all this is quite impressive. Although weight loss was important to me, it's not what drove me to this diet. It was my numbers, and the fact that my mother has HBP and diabetes, and my numbers kept inching up. I have, however, lost 30 of the 50 extra I've been carrying around for 20 years, despite trying every diet under the sun and running and lifting. Kinda stalled with 20 to go, but I keep making tweaks and it's coming off slowly. I still exercise regularly and always plan to. Sorry for the long-winded post, but just wondering what you think about such an improvement in numbers. Are you only against LC because of some of the extreme fanatics? There are plenty of us for whom a sensible version of this diet just works! Just want you to realize that there are many sensible LCers out here. We're not all extreme.
NDpendent said…
For the research, look outside the USA, whose health professionals are so prejudiced they are in cognitive dissociation when it comes to dietary influence on disease. And how about the recent Ohio state research that concluded it was carbs, not ingested animal fats that causes high "bad" cholesterol. The tide is turning, tho. The truth can only be suppressed for so long. Loads of doctors are now discovering from clinical experience that Low carb diets with or without high levels of fat cure many chronic health issues. Btw, had the writer actually read any of the books, he'd have known none of them advocate eating huge amounts of food. High protein is very bad for blood glucose control, causing it to go up. But 25 gr. of carb, 60 gr. Protein which is what I require to keep blood glucose levels normal, isn't much food & will drive my body to starvation mode. (I test every morning. Fasting levels). So I make up the difference with fat gr. But I don't eat entire sticks of butter. More like aTbsp. here and there. I've been on this way of eating for a year now. Feel good, blood glucose is stabilizing, blood lipid profile improved, & I've had weight loss. No hunger or feeling horrible like I did on low fat/low calorie. Odd side effects too like my vision has improved. Skin improved. (moles have disappeared. I thought they were inevitable from aging). This prejudiced man can't convince me to go back to unhealthy low fat, low calorie. I think these closed minded people are eugenicists, wishing to kill off a huge percentage of the population. Or perhaps they are large stock holders in pharmaceutical companies.
carbsane said…
Last I checked, Ohio State was in the USA. That study by Volek's group was blogged on here:

http://carbsanity.blogspot.com/2014/11/that-new-volek-phinney-study-part-i.html

http://carbsanity.blogspot.com/2014/11/that-new-volek-phinney-study-part-ii_26.html

http://carbsanity.blogspot.com/2014/12/that-new-volek-phinney-study-part-iii.html



Levels of saturated fatty acids in fasting triglycerides and such is not any sort of established biomarker, try as the Voleks and Feinmans of this world would have you believe. And besides, the only real change they saw was in the MUFA.

If you are talking about me here "had the writer actually read any of the books, he'd have known ...", I'm a woman, and I don't make a habit of commenting on things I haven't read. You care to see my Kindle? If you're talking about Harley/Durian Rider, I specifically don't endorse him, but he makes some great points about the deceptive reporting on LCHF diets.
MacSmiley said…
Since when does low fat/low calorie need to be unhealthy? Fruit/veg/legumes/whole cooked grains are all healthy and low fat as grown. Plenty of room in the diet for nuts/seeds/olives/ some EVOO if you wish, for healthy fats.

Living on low fat, low cal processed foods is a whole 'nother animal.
carbsane said…
Nope, a prop would be this scallops and bacon dish ;-)

https://twitter.com/CarbSane/status/519235771426177025
Rich Rojas said…
I follow Jimmy on Facebook and Instagram. Lately he's been doing a lot of outraged "carbage" posts. I think most people have gotten the point already. He just posted on FB about the risk pesticides pose to lowering semen quality. Talk about diverting attention from the larger issue.
Kitty said…
I'm reminded of the geniuses who published Seth Roberts' column "Butter Makes Me Smarter" right after he died of a heart attack. Not one of the butter enthusiasts saw the irony.
Kenny M said…
Please see here where Jimmy's designated White Knight™ defends Jimmy to the utter depths of hell when I dare question the stick of butter stunt: http://www.fathead-movie.com/index.php/2014/07/10/review-the-big-fat-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-1060767

Notice he backtracks a bit and claims that it's not a healthy meal, but also not unhealthy.

Then we get down to the real dogmatic proclimation of Mr Fat Head where he admits he'd rather have his daughters eat a full stick of butter than a single slice of bread. In my opinion this should discredit this guy entirely. It's absolutely asinine:
Yes, I’d rather my daughters eat a full stick of Kerrygold than a slice of wheat bread. No question about it. But they’d be full long before they got that far into a stick.


How the hell can low carb be taken seriously anymore?
Rich Rojas said…
LOL, you have a wicked sense of humor.
Kitty said…
I think it shows his completely dysfunctional relationship with food. He showed an Easter cake and gave us all the shocking news that it is unhealthy and said he would NEVER eat something like that again. The concept of cake as a treat to be shared with family and friends on a special occasion is foreign to him. He thinks everyone shares his disorder and that the only options are to consume nothing but treats or to never touch them. What he's sharing is not a healthy message, but his own neurosis.
charles grashow said…
He also posted that bananas had too many carbs
Rich Rojas said…
Just when I thought I could stop paying attention to Jimmy, he's now advising that the Pope eat LCHF. Oy. Gluten-free communion wafers with a pat of grass-fed butter anyone?
carbsane said…
Jimmy once wrote a blog post about low carbers and communion wafers

http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/should-a-christian-low-carb-dieter-refuse-high-carb-communion/2430



Quite frankly, he should worry more about whether or not as a Christian he should be lying through his teeth on a regular basis.
carbsane said…
Well said!
Rich Rojas said…
Wow, that was quite the debate. Seems everyone now wants a RCT to back up any dietary claim - including that eating two sticks of butter at meal time is not healthy. Whatever ever happened to using that high-carb noodle perched atop one's shoulders?
carbsane said…
Thanks for linking to that! Naughton is pure jerk. I pity his girls when they get just a bit older. The precocious know-it-all schtick that comes through on their videos will no longer be seen as cute, just as the reality of the disordered eating they've been raised will sink in.


It's funny that he wouldn't advise an insulin-dependent diabetic to consume starch while he's done his best to turn his former perfectly well adjusted metabolism into one of glucose intolerance.
carbsane said…
Also, his proclamation of "I will not go back to eating carbage" as if there are only two ways to eat is telling. For one, he views all carbs as garbage, but for another, he cannot see eating a truly normal diet that might even include a twinkie here or there as a third option.
charles grashow said…
"You still can’t cite any evidence whatsoever (besides weak appeals to
the “authority” of people on the street and mis-educated doctors) that
eating butter is bad for health."

Paging Seth Roberts!!
David Pete said…
I'm sure he'd be happy to produce all the Bread is deadly RCT's when asked....
Kitty said…
Oh, lord. Jimmy is having blood tests run (again) and his followers are eagerly awaiting his results because they, too, are gaining weight and feel like crap and would like to find the "underlying issue" that's ruining their keto advantage. I know it's awful, but I really can't bring myself to feel sorry for these idiots anymore.
El-bo said…
>> "For one, he views all carbs as garbage"


does he....really ?? i mean, he can't really believe that doughnuts are the same as brown rice.


maybe he is keeping this idea up as an illusion, so that when he eventually does have to introduce carbs back into his diet (and he will), he can claim that he reserved 'carbage' for refined carbs, and that there was nothing wrong with some potato
carbsane said…
If you call him on it -- as McDougall tried to do in their podcast -- he'll be all "yeah this or that might be OK for you but not for Jimmy Moore", and yet he keeps going on about the carbage and sugar and whatnot. It's like he can't make the distinction.

Hey, here's an idea for him to escape his self-imposed dietary prison! Livin La Vida Low Carbage! Jimmy eats a low fat, high legume/tuber/whole grain/fruit diet. Low in carbage.
charles grashow said…
https://instagram.com/p/1A2eAxTJmS/
He says he'll publish the results "Once all the tests are done and the analysis completed."

IMHO this is why he spent so much time attacking Dr Dayspring on twitter. The only question is how bad the blood work will be and exactly what "functional medicine tests to look for any underlying issues going on" show
El-bo said…
>> "It's like he can't make the distinction."

i still see obfuscation, and dancing around the issue. either that, or he is just plain dumb.

even if he has tested (by various means) the effects of carbs on his system, there is still going to be a noticeable difference in the effects of brown rice & beans, and cake

>> "Hey, here's an idea for him to escape his self-imposed dietary prison! Livin La Vida Low Carbage! Jimmy eats a low fat, high legume/tuber/whole grain/fruit diet. Low in carbage."



which is what i was alluding to i.e he can still get to 'carb switzerland', and he only needs to backtrack the part that he can't even look at a kale leaf without his glucose meter striking on grounds of abuse
Wuchtamsel said…
I'm smelling bullshit and a huge pile of it...
charles grashow said…
What happens if the doctor tells Jimmy his lipids are dangerously high and he has either modify his diet or go on statins?? That would be fun conversation to listen to.
charles grashow said…
I'm surprised he didn't do a blog post with BG readings before and every 15 minutes after taking communion.
Kitty said…
He very definitely cannot make the distinction. He compared steak to cake, so even high protein foods are the equivalent of "carbage." I've heard him also say that if you eat fruit you may as well be eating candy.


He preaches that we should all eat real food (#realfood!) and the next tweet will be about the evils of beans or bananas or whole grains or any of a hundred other real foods that people who aren't morbidly obese regularly eat.
Kitty said…
He has already been told this by doctors. He will just hand her a copy of Cholesterol Clarity.
charles grashow said…
This is not going to go very well.
charles grashow said…
jamienlatonia @livinlowcarbman
could you do a post about your testing and results? I have been in
ketosis for a while only to gain/lose the same two pounds. I wonder if
something else could be the issue. Thanks for all the info you share!
Kenny M said…
Can you imagine them wearing 'Wheat is Murder' t-shirts in high school and lecturing girls at the lunch table about the lipid hypothesis and the evils of wheat bread? It's gonna be a disaster. High school is already a social nightmare as it is.
charles grashow said…
Remember when he went to the Perfect Health Diet retreat and posted dozens of pictures of his BG readings? If memory serves me he claims he gained around 20 lbs on th eretreat!!
charles grashow said…
http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/my-severe-hyperinsulinemia-has-dictated-i-go-on-a-high-fat-low-carb-eggfest/7447
My Severe Hyperinsulinemia Has Mandated I Go On A High-Fat, Low-Carb 'Eggfest'

Here are the 10 guidelines I’m following for my eggfest:

1. Must eat eggs as the primary source of fat and protein.
2. 1 tablespoon of butter (or other fat source) used per egg consumed.
3. I must eat an egg no later than 30 minutes after waking.
4. The egg meals ideally should be eaten every 3 hours, but not more than every 5 hours.
5. I will follow this schedule even if I’m not hungry (I’ll have 1 egg when that happens).
6. Cheese will be permitted up to one ounce per egg.
7. A minimum of a half-dozen eggs must be consumed daily.
8. The eggs will be local pastured eggs loaded with healthy omega-3 fats and Vitamin D.
9. Egg consumption will cease three hours before bedtime.
10. Diet soda will be allowed up to 3 cans daily with a goal of 1 or less.

http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/jimmy-moores-fall-2014-cholesterol-thyroid-and-other-health-test-results/23857
Jimmy Moore’s Fall 2014 Cholesterol, Thyroid And Other Health Test Results

I currently weigh 275 pounds and I’m admittedly having some struggles in this area. Sleep is not where it needs to be right now (I just got a Fitbit Flex a few weeks ago to help me track it and so far I’m averaging only 4-5 hours a night) and I am working on dealing with my stress levels which seem to be higher lately. About 30 pounds of the added pounds occurred slowly during the writing of my last two books Cholesterol Clarity and Keto Clarity.
In hindsight, the obvious stress of writing two books with multiple editors, deadlines and such with a major publisher in the span of one year was probably not the best idea for someone like me. While I’m trying to figure out all that’s contributing to this happening, keto is giving me a fighting chance in my health until the weight starts to come down again.

It’s quite ironic how in the pursuit of helping others in their own health journey, I find myself sacrificing a bit of my own health in the process. That said, I’m so incredibly proud of those two books and the positive impact they have made on the lives of the people who have
gotten them. But it does take a toll on your body (I’m not the only health author who has reported this happening). The rest of the weight gain happened during my recent experience participating in Paul Jaminet’s Perfect Health Retreat in North Carolina.
carbsane said…
I vote for obfuscation -- nobody can be that stupid. He decided a while ago that he could keep going on a fanbase of desperate people "in the same boat" who see him as their hero. When Jimmy figures it all out, there will be salvation for them, Sadly, I guess, there's an endless supply of such people on the internet.

This endless cycle of testing and looking for some bogeyman underlying issue when he IGNORES his serious medical issues (cuz no insurance, though how that works now with the requirement, my guess is he'll take the fine and go to his functional med "doc") is beyond comprehension.


Then there's the lying. Pathological as it is.
carbsane said…
It's totally ridiculous his views on wheat, etc. too. Tom is around my age (few years older if memory serves), so he likely grew up on Wonder bread sandwiches and lived to tell about it.
Rich Rojas said…
Sorry, but that "egg diet" is symptomatic of a full-blown eating disorder.
Rich Rojas said…
What is this stuff about "functional medicine?" It's a new one on me. Did a quick read on Wikipedia and it sounds like just another name for alternative and integrative medicine. Does it have some extra woo?
carbsane said…
Pretty much woo woo peddlers, many of which are naturopaths and chiropractors.
carbsane said…
Who talks like this to servers? LOL
El-bo said…
>> "If memory serves me he claims he gained around 20 lbs on the retreat!!"


which, at his level of obesity (and previous LC diet), would have been just water weight
Kitty said…
I call bullshit. BULLSHIT!!! First of all, if, when asked the standard, "Would you like chips and a drink with that?", you are an asshole if you feel the need to respond to that obligatory question with anything but a yes or no answer. Second, there is no way that the "girl" argued that chips and soda are good carbs. Sorry, but no way. A young woman who makes minimum wage at Chipotle does not give a shit how the morbidly obese guy ordering the Barbacoa bowl sans beans and rice (#realfood) eats.


If this actually happened, I can only imagine how his attempt at #neverstopeducating went. The woman probably told all her friends how today she waited on a rude fat guy who tried to educate her about nutrition.
Wuchtamsel said…
I think that's obvious, isn't it? It's him who is the expert! He has written a book about it, not his doc! Never could a "thriving", health conscious, ketogenic superman like Jimmy learn anything from a doc...
Kitty said…
"he went into that whole phd thing with the intention of vindicating himself."



That's the rub. I'm sure he slept like he hadn't in years and felt better too, but it didn't fit his business model or diet religion, and God forbid it get out to his exhausted followers. He and his wife have loooong list of weird ailments that they had Paul Jaminet (blogger, not doctor) review, so they know that they are not healthy. They think this is caused by their former lifestyle and don't dream that it is a result of long-term carbohydrate restriction.


At the risk of sounding horrible, I wonder if their infertility problems, including the loss of adopted embryos, isn't related to the avoidance of a macronutrient that humans have consumed for millennia.
carbsane said…
>>At the risk of sounding horrible, I wonder if their infertility problems, including the loss of adopted embryos, isn't related to the avoidance of a macronutrient that humans have consumed for millennia.<<

Not sure about the underlying fertility issue, but I distinctly recall Jimmy using words to the effect of "buckling down" on his wife's carb intake. In the few videos I watched or pictures he posted, she only ever had a plate of eggs, and instead of toast (her usual fix) for morning sickness? Medication.

It all seems like some weird dietary Münchausen/Münchausen-by-proxy thing going on there.
carbsane said…
Oh this is total bull. His health begs to differ that rice and beans are the good carbs? I would have had to ask what health ;-)
Rich Rojas said…
In "Keto Clarity" he describes how he orders extra butter when dining out. Christine will chime in to let the server know that he's not kidding about how much extra butter he expects to be delivered.
Wuchtamsel said…
Yes, I already thought about that, too. And it seems to work in both directions. Reading that Jimmy's wife regularly "reminds" him to eat makes me cringe looking at his body...
charles grashow said…
Jimmy Moore's theme song

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjI7VeIA7ZI
charles grashow said…
>> "If memory serves me he claims he gained around 20 lbs on the retreat!!"

which, at his level of obesity (and previous LC diet), would have been just water weight



EXCEPT - he's NEVER lost the weight.
Thomas said…
LOL! Pure, unadulterated pith! I think I'm in love with you.
charles grashow said…
http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/jimmy-moores-random-fall-2013-health-test-results/20619

Jimmy Moore’s Random Fall 2013 Health Test Results
Rich Rojas said…
If he did, it seems rather pointless. Whatever muscle gains they show are kinda overshadowed by the 35-40% BF%. Not exactly six-pack abs territory.
Kenny M said…
Where did he mention having blood tests again? I'm looking forward to seeing those results.
charles grashow said…
https://instagram.com/p/1A2eAxTJmS/
Trae Palmer said…
This * 1000. What's worse is imagining how his interaction with the person preparing the barbacoa bowl went. My experience at Chipotle has been that they only give one a moderate amount of whichever 'protein' they order: I only ever get the sofritas and they put a scoop or *maybe* two on my burrito, but when I've gone with my parents and friends, as far as I've witnessed, it's the same practice with their meats, as well. Now, for normal human beings, this isn't really an issue, as the employee preparing the food item (including their bowls) tends to load it to the brim with rice and beans resulting in something satisfying and filling for most people and not really dependent on a huge addition of meat, dairy or vegetables. But for those with dietary restrictions the likes of Jimmy Moore, I shudder to think what the final product actually looked like or if he 'talked' the employees into preparing said barbacoa bowl with extra meat, cheese, sour cream and guacamole, the last of which *usually* costs extra (but if JM talked to the cashier the way he did, I wouldn't put it past him to demand they add it for free, since he declined the rice and beans around which the servers typically expect to assemble a food item, except for their salads, but Jimmy used the word 'bowl', so I'll assume that's what he ordered). There are fajita vegetables, lettuce and pico de gallo available, but if his wife is following a similarly protein-moderated LCHF diet as does Jimmy, it seems like the result would be too high in protein for his liking, because after all, barbacoa + veggies with no added fat might as well be bonbons in the dietary mindset of Jimmy Moore (and Chipotle's nutrition calculator indicates their barbacoa provides around 38 % kcal from fat, 58 % from protein, so it's not an unusually fatty meat or something that would cross into JM's preferred territory of 80+ % kcal from fat on its own).

Methinks he must've had them load this up with guacamole and dairy products to up the fat in the meal or he considers it a once-per-year treat for his wife...essentially a meaty Easter basket. Moreover, when this concoction, in whatever form it finally took, was packaged up and then handed off to the cashier, he then claims to have subsequently offered her a mini-lecture in nutrition.

Yeah, 'never stop educating' about how to be completely socially inept and ridiculous at a restaurant with already-harried employees (not sure about where he lives, but Chipotles are perennially crowded and their servers busy here in SoCal).
MacSmiley said…
Worse than "angry vegans" as some call anyone vaguely plant-based.

I'm sorry to hear about their fertility issues. It makes it all the more ironic that he would tweet about those evil strawberries adversely affecting sperm counts.
MacSmiley said…
Too bad the Chipotle personnel are required to be polite to all comers. 😉
MacSmiley said…
Anyi-sugar salesmen like Mark Hyman.
Jane Karlsson said…
Look carefully at that smile. It isn't a real smile at all. This is a man who has put in a lot of effort and did not get the results he expected. It's only a matter of time before he realises he's been taken for a ride.

Recently I read a Jeff Volek interview. He is quite muddled. First he seems to say you don't need to be ketoadapted because your brain can use ketones right away. Then he says ketoadaptation is very important. He says nothing about the discovery two years ago that beta hydroxybutyrate is a histone deacetylase inhibitor. That's how ketogenic diets work, almost certainly. Ketoadaptation involves mitochondrial biogenesis, and HDAC inhibitors do that.

Perhaps the reason Volek says nothing about HDAC inhibition is that he has an awful feeling mitochondrial biogenesis might not be dependent on a ketogenic diet.
Wuchtamsel said…
Treating his medical issues would cost him less per month than an average week of butter. Generic atorvastatin, generic metformin, generic ramipril... probably done...
carbsane said…
Jimmy has no interest in treating his medical issues.
charles grashow said…
According to Zoe Harcombe unless you have FH virtually NO ONE has high cholesterol!
"

http://www.zoeharcombe.com/2015/03/worried-about-cholesterol-andor-statins/

" My top tip is: don’t have a cholesterol test and then you’ll have one fewer thing to worry about."

"If your cholesterol is anywhere on those normal charts (2-10 mmol/l = 77-387 mg/dl) – you may like to stop worrying."

"If you actually have high cholesterol (e.g. 10 mmol/l = 387 mg/dl or above) OR your cholesterol is high for you (i.e. relative to what you know yours normally is – your normal – not the made up normal), remember that your body makes cholesterol for good reason and consider the following: are you injured? stressed? pregnant? recovering from an operation? illness? Any of these will encourage your body to make more cholesterol."

"Have you had a cholesterol test taken at the end of winter? in the heart of winter? Vitamin D is made by sunlight synthesizing cholesterol on the skin when you expose your skin to sunlight. Your cholesterol may simply be ‘high’ right now because you haven’t turned it into vitamin D (it’s the low vitamin D that will harm you – not the ‘high’ cholesterol – the high cholesterol can be a sign that you’re lacking vitamin D). Have another test at the end of the summer and make sure you give your body the chance to make some vitamin D with healthy sun exposure (not too much, not burning)."

So -all of us need to stop worrying - Zoe a=said so!
carbsane said…
This is absurd.
carbsane said…
While there was nothing remarkable about his DEXA, Jimmy tried to spin the between test results as actually gaining muscle while losing fat. A sirloin on each arm as Fat Head Naughton confirmed! What is more interesting is that back in like 2006 or so, Jimmy had a body comp check at work -- no doubt on a Tanita type scale. He was 11% body fat thus he went on and on about his appearance of excess fat being due to loose skin and dense bones. If he had maintained at 230, even having some excess fat would probably not be anyone's business but his own. But HE posted shirtless pics at the time and even at his goal weight it was obvious there was more than loose skin. (Repeat, so what, just that he kept saying it was). These DEXA's at around 30-35 lbs over goal don't jive with the 11% BF he actually "believed" he had.
Rich Rojas said…
11% BF would be remarkable. I'm fighting to get mine below 20%.
Rich Rojas said…
I was not familiar with Zoe Harcombe (so many people to read up on). Noticed this comment from her:

"The reverse pathway is all about carbohydrate. In the absence of
carbohydrate, the body will call upon a hormone called glucagon to break
down body fat to release the glycerol backbone. If the body has glucose
available in the blood stream and/or stored as glycogen, the body has
no need to burn fat. Certain states of exercise (VO2 max kind of stuff)
aside, I cannot conceive of the circumstances in which the body would
burn body fat if glucose is available"

Looks like she's part of the Taubes' GCBC school of thought.
Wuchtamsel said…
That's just completely insane. The part about Vitamin D, the heal-all panacea of thiese fools is just the hilarious icing on the cake.
I really have a hard time believing you can write something like THAT in the US without risking legal consequences.(?) Couldn't someone sue her after a MI for example, claiming he/she has been following her ridiculous advice?
Wuchtamsel said…
lol
Everybody who knows how an 11% fat body looks like won't stop laughing until 2020...
charles grashow said…
Well Zoe is in the UK

So there's this

http://asa.org.uk/Rulings/Adjudications/2014/12/Zo%C3%AB-Harcombe/SHP_ADJ_274813.aspx#.VSGOHfnF9oo

ASA Adjudication on Zoë Harcombe


Her predictable response
http://www.zoeharcombe.com/2014/11/the-asa-trolls-working-together-to-censor-progressive-thinking/
Rob L. said…
Your fascination (obsession) with Jimmy Moore is quite disturbing. Maybe there is a carb for that.
Rob L. said…
I invite anyone who thinks the obesity crisis is a myth to ride public transportation in a large city in the United States.
charles grashow said…
Jimmy Moore will be interviewing her.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/2015/03/diets_do_not_work_the_thin_evidence_that_losing_weight_makes_you_healthier.single.html

The Weight of the Evidence
It’s time to stop telling fat people to become thin.
By Harriet Brown
Rich Rojas said…
I agree that it's possible to be overweight and in good health, but I can't say that I agree with the claim that weight has no bearing on blood pressure. My GP a few years back showed me a plot of my BP vs weight and there was a linear correlation - BP went up along with my weight. Of course that's just an n=1 study.

I think there are other health issues that get overlooked with excess weight such as the wear and tear on joints. It can't be good to have 300+ lbs grinding on those knee joints for most of one's life.

This caught my eye and something that would be good to raise during the interview: “Those who have a BMI of 30 and up need treatment, no questions asked,”
Gordon said…
It's not about Jimmy Moore, it's about what he represents. He just happens to be a big fat target ... in many ways. ;)
Rob L. said…
I would love to see what a lot of you keyboard warriors look like with your diets.
carbsane said…
You seem rather obsessed. Keyboard warrior ;-)
Rob L. said…
Clearly I am the one with an article about one single person every other day. You are so right.
carbsane said…
Every other day, eh? I'm only reminding folks of the same shit different day (year) with this scammer. But I do notice how Rob L comments on any of the numerous science posts.
Rob L. said…
I do not see much "science" here unless "science" is attacking those with whom you do not agree? For what it's worth eating a stick of butter is insane but that is not my point. You seem to put a lot of effort in "exposing the fraud" of Jimmy Moore. To each his own though.
carbsane said…
Exposing fraud is a noble effort. Or do you prefer to support hucksters? As Gordon said, it's not about the person it's about what he stands for. Jimmy Moore is a very dangerous man giving out often dangerous advice. Look around the rest of the blog Takes your blinders off.
Rob L. said…
I am not "low carb." I am Paleo (with some dairy) which in my view is carb agnostic. Before Paleo, I was nearly 200 pounds, my fasting blood sugar was extremely high, and I was Stage 2 hypertension. 3 months after Paleo, I was down to 165, my fasting blood sugar was normal, and my blood pressure also normalized. Over 2 years later, I have maintained those results.


While I do not eat pasta, bread, rice, legumes, etc more than half my plate is vegetables and greens for each meal. My lifestyle has never "stopped working." I do not track my daily carb count but it certainly less than the "recommended" 350 grams.



I am certainly going to look around - maybe I have only seen "attack posts" because they seem to be the most popular.
carbsane said…
I can't control what's popular.

I also cannot stand folks whose diets have stopped working for them, and are even working against them by their own "confessionals" , still selling the diet to make $$.
Kitty said…
Or to go take a look at a playground. When I was a kid in the 80's, there was always one unfortunate fat kid, which is why the one fat kid had it so bad and was picked on. Now I'm always shocked when I see a group of kids because so many of them are fat.
Rob L. said…
Since I do not have children, I do not go to the playground. I am 37 and like you we only had 1 or 2 overweight kids in class and even those kids were not morbidly obese. Now when I see kids on the bus, streetcar, or at the supermarket it is staggering how a 10 year old can be almost twice my weight.


We can disagree on the causes of obesity but we all have to acknowledge it's a recent change (last 30 years) and it needs to be addressed yesterday.
Wuchtamsel said…
Why not... It's not THAT difficult to be leaner and healthier than Jimmy, eating WHATEVER diet.
BTW I eat the "recommended" 350g of carbs and more, next to 15-30g of fat. My blood pressure and blood glucose are both in the ideal range and my LDL-C was 61mg/dl with an HDL-C of 58 mg/dl last time I checked three months ago.
Interest in eating sticks of Kerrygold or drinking buttered coffee to "improve health"? Zero...
Jane Karlsson said…
Rob L, could I ask you please, what were you eating before Paleo? I imagine it included pasta, bread and rice. Were these refined or unrefined? I would be very surprised indeed if all of them were unrefined and still your health was so poor. There seem to be a lot of people who think their good health is due to Paleo / low carb / keto when it's actually due to elimination of refined carbs.
Rob L. said…
Prior to Paleo, a typical breakfast would have been a bowl of Raisin Bran cereal and slice of toast. Lunch would have been a sandwich on "whole wheat" bread - almost always tuna or turkey. Dinner would have the only real variance and would have depended on what I wanted to eat. Sometimes a sandwich again other times it would be pasta.


Since Paleo, my typical breakfast is eggs (usually 3) with pork or turkey sausage patties or bacon and a side of spinach. Lunch is usually a salad or leftovers from dinner the nights before. Dinner is typically a protein source (4-6 ounces) with vegetables and greens.


Prior to Paleo, I was always hungry. I was suppressing legitimate hunger pangs (or what I appeared to be hunger pangs) most of the day until I could get a hold of a snack. I was constantly snacking.


Now since I started Paleo it is rare for me to be hungry in between meals and I rarely snack. When I do snack it is a piece of fruit pr a handful of almonds. I just ate a breakfast of 3 scrambled eggs and 2 pork sausage patties. It is 0830 and I probably will not be hungry until 1300.
Jane Karlsson said…
Thanks. What proportion of the carbs you ate were refined, would you say? Half? A quarter? Three quarters? Pasta sounds white to me, and so does toast, but I could be wrong.

I used to have exactly the same problems with constant hunger you did, when I was eating mostly but not exclusively unrefined carbs. Things changed completely when I eliminated all refined carbs. That was over 30 years ago and I have never experienced hunger since. I thought it was normal, but it wasn't.
carbsane said…
Congratulations on your success. What DO you eat for carbs? Tubers? Squashes? Fruit? Veggies don't count, there are trace carbs in most.
carbsane said…
The real killer for me was Westman's Doctor's Note confirming that Jimmy eats a lot of fat. As if anyone really doubted?
Rich Rojas said…
Dr. Westman's comments in the book are some of the most head scratching. I've been highlighting stuff in my Kindle version as I go. This one I highlighted in red because it didn't make any sense the first time I read it and still really doesn't:

"Eating carbohydrates makes you hungry. If you don't eat carbohydrates, there is no hunger. Of course, you'll never know this until you stop eating carbohydrates. Most Americans have eaten carbohydrates every single day of their lives!"
Rob L. said…
I do not really think of foods in terms of how many carbs, protein grams, or fat grams are contained in my food. I eat a fair amount of sweet potatoes, white potatoes, kohlrabi, and other root vegetables. I also eat a fair amount of fruit, especially strawberries, blueberries, blackberries, bananas, and oranges.


I always thought of squash as a vegetable but I guess it's botanically it is a fruit. I eat a fair amount of zucchini and butternut squash as well.


You would consider me low carb but the LC community certainly would not. If I had to guess I am probably between 100-140 grams carbs/ day.
Rob L. said…
I would imagine most was considered refined even though I tried to always purchase "whole grain" versions of bread and pasta. I am not a nutritionist or biochemist so I do not know exactly why Paleo is working for me so well, I just know that it does. I am 37 and feel better and I am healthier than I was in my 20s.


I also know several people who are not doing so well on Paleo but when we discuss the matter, it's usually someone trying to concoct alternatives to breads, pastas, cookies, etc. I recognize for some people even "true paleo" will not work for them and I always encourage those people to just find what works. I explain everything is n=1.
Gordon said…
The guy in the white cap and heart rate monitor would be me.

http://api.ning.com/files/KzOvBNTGFEH3FY5d3pKm3d17mJvetwidIR0ocXO-VIVlJrJT0565El1V86dXrOJjo5Zz9HtV6WHtgEyJkHJVOyHfmEe3Ahe*/DSC_1589.JPG
charles grashow said…
Rob L.

you said - I eat a fair amount of sweet potatoes, white potatoes, kohlrabi, and
other root vegetables. I also eat a fair amount of fruit, especially
strawberries, blueberries, blackberries, bananas, and oranges.

When do you eat them? No mention was made when you described what you eat for B,L & D except for a piece of fruit w/almonds for a snack.
charles grashow said…
What do you think is the cause?
Gordon said…
So Rob, do you consider Jimmy to be Paleo?
Jane Karlsson said…
Finding what works sounds like such a good idea. That's what I did when I was eating one meal a day and keeping my blood sugar up with sweet coffee. It worked! I wasn't getting fat! But when I replaced the sweet coffee with apples and starting eating breakfast, I found out that it hadn't really been working at all. I would be a diabetic arthritic wreck by now if I hadn't come to my senses.
Rob L. said…
Massive amounts of sugar. From what I see most kids these days have more sugar that the body needs or can tolerate before lunch. Kids today bombard their bodies with sugar from cereal, pop tarts, sodas, juices, candy, etc.
Rob L. said…
I am 37 and I can still remember when the 16 ounce bottle of soda was introduced, then the 20 ounce bottle................. Growing up I may have consumed 1 or 2 12 ounce cans per day. Now it's nothing for a kid or even an adult to consume a 2L or more per day.
Rob L. said…
I eat greens at every meal. Sweet potatoes at breakfast at times. Fruit is usually in between meals but can sometimes but with a meal. I try to eat a lot of vegetables with every meal also. I am not insanely "low carb" IMO but you guys probably feel differently.
carbsane said…
Who are these kids of which you speak? All of those things were available when I was a kid and many of my friends ate/drank some of them daily. We were not an obese generation.
MacSmiley said…
Um. Isn't gaining health/losing weight by eating butter by the stick Jimmy Moore's schtick?
MacSmiley said…
Dr. Dayspring's verdict on Zoë's article:
MacSmiley said…
Here's Dr. Dayspring's verdict on Zoë's article…
Rob L. said…
Like I said, these things were there for me to consume and I did not consume them but I personally did not consume them in massive amounts every day. 1 or 2 sodas may not be harmful to the body but drinking a 2 liter of soda daily has to be. I know several people with children who drink about a 2 liter each per day. Sugar itself can be fine but I think its the "dosage" these days - it's being consumed in ever increasing massive amounts today.


Doesn't the World Health Organization recommend we limit sugar consumption to 6 teaspoons per day (or at least its newest proposal)? There is almost 6 teaspoons in 1 8 ounce glass of orange juice. Who drinks just 8 ounces of OJ at breakfast? I would guess almost no one who drinks OJ (I do not).
Wuchtamsel said…
Yes, but it's the same with fast-food portion sizes for example, not only sugar. After the whopper and the double whopper came the triple and the quadruple whopper, making us eagerly await the quintuple whopper... It's more of everything, more and MORE! MOORE! (pardon me...)
"Value" is useful in many aspects of life In nutrition, value is fatal cause it causes grotesque overconsumption.
carbsane said…
So here is my issue. IF these kids exist ( I don't know any personally, though I've witnessed unsupervised children with money in hand make poor choices) , whose idea is this sort of intake? Are these kids eating chicken breast, salad with lemon juice and plain baked potatoes or rice and beans with tomatoes for the rest of their diet? NO.


So let's stop blaming everything on "carbage" or the "bad advice" Jimmy spends his career trying to convince people made him fat. Nobody every said 15 sodas and two boxes of LIttle Debbies was a healthy diet. A kid in my day might have had a single packaged Twinkie and a can of coke (though little cans of tomato or apple juice would have been more common, and even today's juice boxes are much smaller than a standard can of soda).

This man is a menace. You disagree?
carbsane said…
While this is a bit different with your Family Style fast food (e.g. Olive Garden type establishments), your basic fast food has added more fat and some protein to its offerings than carbs. Nobody goes to McD's for an extra large soda -- they go for burgers and fries. When I was in high school a bacon double cheesburger was a favorite lunch (it's how I got pudgy) but I've had these as an adult and they aren't anywhere near the most calorific offering on the menu. Nobody is getting fat on McD's buns, it's the greazy burgers, fries and various saucifications.



When I was LC I occasionally used to get those BK stackers -- a 3 or 4 patty slider -- and ditch the bun. No wonder when traveling frequently (meaning more fast food), I would plateau, etc. I would have been better off with a "cheat" and having a Subway ;-) But I do appreciate the "groove" of staying on a plan.
Rob L. said…
You got me there. Everything is supersized these days. Personally, I can barely down 1/4 pound of hamburger without the bun much less 3/4 of a pound with the bun, large fries, and 40 ounces of soda.


I still believe it's mostly the massive amounts of sugar that are a primary cause of obesity but I am open to thought it's other factor as well such as simply ingesting a massive number of calories.
Rob L. said…
I do not eat fast food anymore but I will frequently eat a 1/4 hamburger. ground turkey, ground bison patties in a lettuce wrap, sweet potato fries cooked in coconut oil, along with a large glass of water. I am not convinced it is saturated fat that has people approaching 1/4 of a ton. When you talk to most of those people, they get a large number of empty calories from sugar, particularly sugar the manufacturer hides by calling it any number of names ending in -ose.
Rob L. said…
I see where you are going now and see where I worded things poorly. Of course it's not the kids doing it to themselves but parents who value convenience over health. It is certainly not "value" because it costs way more to eat fast food than it does to cook at home.


Not all carbs are "bad" but I was asked what is causing the obesity epidemic. I sincerely believe it's a massive amount of sugar being ingested.


I do not know if Jimmy Moore is a menace. I personally think ingesting an entire stick of Kerrygold butter is insane. I can barely get down a tablespoon cooked with my eggs. I first found Jimmy Moore when I was looking for a pasta that would not get me insulin spikes. I found his n=1 experiment on Dreamsfiled pasta and it convinced me to just use zucchini noodles as my "pasta."


My n=1 experiment is that excessive carbs (maybe it's refined carbs mostly) causes my blood sugar to rise dramatically. Since I have a family history of diabetes, it is concerning to me. Since I went Paleo, when I monitor my blood sugar, my resting blood sugar is normal any rises after a meal are nominal.
carbsane said…
Sugar -- particularly in liquid form -- adds a lot of calories in humans. As does fat. Think of some of those 1000 cal milk shakes and try to imagine eating the same amount of beans. This adds up calories.

If you look at a single burger and small fry at McDs, that can easily be worked into most people's diets without causing caloric mahem. I get cross-eyed looks when I order that at Wendy's (cannot stand McD's, and I think it's a medium b/c there's no small, but it's been a long while). Most are ordering doubles, And nowadays people eat out fast food more often than 30-40 years ago as well.
Rob L. said…
Granted but (at least to me) it is very difficult to ingest 2000 calories of fat, I just get way too full. It would have been nothing for me to drink 6-8 20 ounce cokes 2+ years ago which is close to 2000 calories.


IMO anyone ingesting 222+ grams of fat in a day is pushing way past their bodies' satiety signals.
Wuchtamsel said…
Sugar and refined carbs have their role in the process without a doubt. But the obese person who got fat on soda and hard candy exclusively probably doesn't exist if you ask me. These crapfoods come in clusters of everything that is energy-dense and cheap, while lacking fibre! It's easy to eat a lot of that and not feel full.
I agree that a steak with salad is a much better food choice than a hamburger any time, even if the calculated portion has the same amount of calories on paper. Just because you have to chew the steak which is not "predigested" like the burger and the salad ads volume and fibre that is satiating as such. So in the end, you will eat less of your "portion".
Rob L. said…
I personally eat a lot less when I am eating more than the "recommended" grams of fat. I am sure it's a combination of things but my fat intake is much larger than most Americans and my carb content is much smaller. I am 5'9 and 165 pounds.


You really have to push through his body's satiety signals to consume too much fat alone. I am sure it's a different story when you are also consuming 700 calories of liquid sugar with it.
Gordon said…
If 5'9ish means actually 5'9", your BMI is 24.4 That's borderline when the limit of normal is 24.9 ... Unless you're quite a bit more muscular than average, you're pudgy.
Rob L. said…
hahah there is always one. "You are within 'normal weight' but it's 'high normal' so you are fat and obviously need more carbs." I am certainly not "anorexic" but there is little fat on my body. Maybe I should go back to eating pasta, rice, etc so I can have a BMI of 28.8 (5'9, 195#).
Rob L. said…
Also BMI is probably the stupidest method of measuring health ever invented.
carbsane said…
What's that toothbrush periscope looking at? (grin)
carbsane said…
I think you'd have to push through normal satiety signals if you ate to the "food pyramid" as well. But even if 2L soda a day, that's like 750 cal. Most men and some women would still have carbs left in the day to eat.

Meanwhile if one chose a more reasonable carb source, or even the evil bread, one would need to eat like 12 slices of bread to equal that 2L of soda.
Rob L. said…
I do not agree (when it comes to refined carbs at least.) Even a cereal I thought was "healthy" (Raisin Bran) has about 18 grams of sugar per 1 cup serving. 2 years ago I had no problem powering through 2 large bowls of raisin bran with my slice of toast. Two hours later I felt like I was practically "starving" and would need a snack or I would just have to power through "hunger pangs."


Assuming those large bowls were 1 cup each (doubtful) I was taking in about 380 calories plus whatever calories I was getting from "healthy" skim milk.

My 3 egg and 2 slices of bacon or sausage patties has about the same caloric intake (if not less) and I am not hungry for several hours (you know normal).


I rather deal with a few extra grans of fat than deal with the feeling that I am hungry even though I know I just ate.
carbsane said…
In your two meals, it is the difference in protein that sticks out at me most. The milk is likely as much protein as in one of those eggs. The satiety factor of protein is well documented. (Not just in this study, but here's a science post you might like from the early days here: http://carbsanity.blogspot.com/2010/04/high-protein-diet-induces-sustained.html ) I don't get the either/or mentality. Indeed in the upcoming NuSI (semi-repeat) trial they will employ a high protein (25%) "standard carb" diet in the weight loss phase. This was done previously and all lost weight as they predicted. If you were to eat one bowl of raisin bran with a cup of 0% Greek yogurt I'm betting even the refined nature of the cereal would not be an issue.